Package Details: nvidia-340xx 340.108-37

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-340xx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-340xx
Description: NVIDIA drivers for linux, 340xx legacy branch
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: nvidia
Submitter: simonsmh
Maintainer: JerryXiao
Last Packager: JerryXiao
Votes: 72
Popularity: 0.112666
First Submitted: 2019-06-07 10:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-10 16:52 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

JerryXiao commented on 2022-10-13 03:51 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-14 02:44 (UTC) by JerryXiao)

For testing users, contributors: check out https://github.com/archlinux-jerry/nvidia-340xx
Warning: force push may happen to match the aur tree

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 .. 59 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2021-05-08 10:28 (UTC)

I am unfamiliar with manjaro but I thought they dropped this driver a while ago. Are you using the 5.12 kernel there where you report a functional driver? Is it this package you're using to build the kernel module?

tioguda commented on 2021-05-08 01:17 (UTC)

@graysky could you tell me a test to make sure everything is fine with the 5.12 kernel?

In Manjaro Gnome the system starts and I don't have the problems reported by @jayache80. In Plasma I can only start via startx on tty2, I haven't tested it with Xfce.

Greetings.

graysky commented on 2021-05-07 12:39 (UTC)

OK, if this doesn't give a functional module for the 5.12 series of kernels, we need to either 1) identify someone else's work to fix it (ie a patch from another distro or person), or 2) we need someone with expertise to fix it for us. I am not that someone nor do I have any hardware for testing.

nahno commented on 2021-05-07 03:59 (UTC)

I can confirm 2). Tested yesterday. My machine (xfce4) stills runs on Linux 5.11.7 without any issues though.

graysky commented on 2021-05-06 18:33 (UTC)

So there are two independent issues:

1) The patch shared by @qileilu is for the 460 series of drivers and not applicable to this version. 2) The package is-as does not work under 5.12.

Can someone else confirm point #2 is valid? If so, we will need to identify the reason why and see if a known fix is out there.

m31aur commented on 2021-05-06 16:09 (UTC)

Whilst it builds without errors on 5.12, the system is unusable. At least with xfce4 that I am using. (xfwm fails to start). It works brilliantly on 5.10

lucasrizzini commented on 2021-05-06 12:50 (UTC)

The patch below is for 460 version..

graysky commented on 2021-05-06 11:00 (UTC)

I thought this worked with 5.12 without patches. It certainly builds which is all I can do testing-wise.

qileilu commented on 2021-05-06 04:42 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-06 04:43 (UTC) by qileilu)

Tested,the patch for 5.12 is available. http://rglinuxtech.com/?p=2896 https://gist.githubusercontent.com/joanbm/7a034ac4b79396c3841040e410ef7e91/raw/b21e792dc0b6f891a4a83d182e0ba9b24b36bd80/nvidia-fix-linux-5.12.patch

jayache80 commented on 2021-05-02 23:31 (UTC)

I tried the 5.12 kernel from testing repo and have the same results. X11 starts fine, however graphics acceleration doesn't work properly. I still get the same libEGL-related double free coredump when using mpv (as seen in my previous comment). Some other datapoints: screen tearing exists (where it didn't before) and I cannot start gears, receiving the following error output:

X Error of failed request:  BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)
  Major opcode of failed request:  155 (NV-GLX)
  Minor opcode of failed request:  4 ()
  Resource id in failed request:  0x2400002
  Serial number of failed request:  56
  Current serial number in output stream:  56

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 .. 59 Next › Last »