Search Criteria
Package Details: openblas-lapack 0.3.29-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/openblas-lapack.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | openblas-lapack |
Description: | Optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2 1.13 BSD (providing blas, lapack, and cblas) |
Upstream URL: | http://www.openblas.net/ |
Licenses: | BSD |
Conflicts: | blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke, openblas |
Provides: | blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke, openblas |
Submitter: | sftrytry |
Maintainer: | thrasibule |
Last Packager: | thrasibule |
Votes: | 92 |
Popularity: | 0.000594 |
First Submitted: | 2013-11-20 23:53 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-01-13 18:13 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- gcc-fortran (gcc-fortran-gitAUR, gcc11-fortranAUR, gcc-fortran-snapshotAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (641)
- abinit (requires blas)
- abinit (requires lapack)
- admixtools-git (requires openblas)
- algodoo (requires lapack)
- ambertools (requires blas)
- ambertools (requires lapack)
- amino-git (requires cblas)
- amino-git (requires lapack)
- apbs (requires blas)
- apbs (requires lapack)
- armadillo (requires blas)
- armadillo (requires lapack)
- arpack-git (requires lapack)
- arrayfire-git (requires cblas)
- arrayfire-git (requires lapacke)
- astromatic-sextractor (requires openblas)
- atompaw (requires lapack)
- atomsk-git (requires blas)
- atomsk-git (requires lapack)
- avs-device-sdk (requires cblas)
- Show 621 more...
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 16 Next › Last »
thrasibule commented on 2023-05-01 16:02 (UTC)
@prs What's your cpu? I can reproduce with an old xeon, but all my other machines pass the test fine.
prs commented on 2023-04-29 16:57 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-01 08:41 (UTC) by prs)
At this step it has stopped. Tried several times. Tried on a new install as well.
The previous version (0.3.21.1) was installed without any such difficulty.
[Edit] The issue mentioned above happens on both 0.5.22 and 0.5.23. Any workarounds will be appreciated as it is urgent.
schaap137 commented on 2023-03-31 04:42 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-31 04:44 (UTC) by schaap137)
Parallel build fails here as well, adding
MAKE_NB_JOBS=1
to_config
solves it.a.kudelin commented on 2023-03-29 09:08 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-29 09:15 (UTC) by a.kudelin)
Changing options to
options=(!emptydirs !makeflags !buildflags)
solves the problem.damir commented on 2023-03-28 20:14 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-28 20:22 (UTC) by damir)
i can confirm - parallel build fails also for me (on a 5950x):
workaround working for me:
Bevan commented on 2023-03-28 18:22 (UTC)
Building 0.3.22 fails for me when parallel build is enabled (I have -j20 set as part of my MAKEFLAGS in makepkg.conf). The build process fails with either "bus error" or the attempt to allocate petabytes of memory. I had to add "-j1" to _config to make it build.
There is a bug report from February sounding a bit like this but it is supposed to be fixed already: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/3899
forcegk commented on 2022-10-13 11:36 (UTC)
Hi there! As I have been suggesting to all scientific packages to date, it would be very beneficial to also include FFLAGS//FCFLAGS on the PKGBUILD. Something along the lines of if defined FFLAGS on the environment (within makepkg), then FFLAGS=${FFLAGS}, else use $CFLAGS (for example)
thrasibule commented on 2022-02-01 02:33 (UTC)
sha256sum is still the same for me. I'm curious if you use this address: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/releases/download/v0.3.19/OpenBLAS-0.3.19.tar.gz, is the sha256sum the same?
Cebtenzzre commented on 2022-01-27 21:09 (UTC)
The sha256sum of the patch changed. It is now 972aa53d2fbbe76b46a1cd1a9e53ddfeb42968e701e0cb8894a5bc3c1072847d.
thrasibule commented on 2021-12-29 19:07 (UTC)
@kwyjibo9999 Please report upstream if you have a reproducible example.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 16 Next › Last »