Search Criteria
Package Details: opencl-nvidia-470xx 470.256.02-7
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-470xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | nvidia-470xx-utils |
Description: | OpenCL implemention for NVIDIA |
Upstream URL: | http://www.nvidia.com/ |
Keywords: | driver nvidia video |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | opencl-nvidia |
Provides: | opencl-driver, opencl-nvidia |
Submitter: | jonathon |
Maintainer: | Sinyria (cysp74, SoftExpert) |
Last Packager: | SoftExpert |
Votes: | 100 |
Popularity: | 1.18 |
First Submitted: | 2021-10-31 00:50 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-10 08:39 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
- opencl-headers (opencl-headers-gitAUR) (optional) – headers necessary for OpenCL development
Required by (67)
- aftershotpro2 (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- aftershotpro3 (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- arrayfire-git (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- bfgminer-git (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- computecpp (requires opencl-driver)
- cpu-x-opencl (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- cuda-10.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-10.2 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-11.1 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-11.7 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-8.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-9.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-9.2 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.1 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.4 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.4-versioned (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda12.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda12.0-versioned (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cytoscape (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- davinci-resolve (requires opencl-driver)
- Show 47 more...
Sources (11)
- 0001-Fix-conftest-to-ignore-implicit-function-declaration.patch
- 0002-Fix-conftest-to-use-a-short-wchar_t.patch
- 0003-Fix-conftest-to-use-nv_drm_gem_vmap-which-has-the-se.patch
- https://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/470.256.02/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-470.256.02.run
- kernel-6.10.patch
- kernel-6.12.patch
- nvidia-470xx-utils.sysusers
- nvidia-470xx.rules
- nvidia-drm-outputclass.conf
- systemd-homed-override.conf
- systemd-suspend-override.conf
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 41 Next › Last »
SinClaus commented on 2024-06-05 07:25 (UTC)
CRC error on install, installation filed!
SoftExpert commented on 2024-06-05 06:42 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-05 06:48 (UTC) by SoftExpert)
@gbr: thanks for the heads-up; the Current graphics driver releases page is not yet updated. I'm currently building the new version to see if the patches still apply ...
edit:
This new version still requires the previous patches. It seems that it comes with a single fix:
Fixed a bug that could cause the X server to crash when graphics applications requested single-buffered drawables while certain features (such as Vulkan sharpening) are enabled.
SoftExpert commented on 2024-05-29 06:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-29 06:36 (UTC) by SoftExpert)
@marco.righi I'm not 100% sure, but I feel that your configuration mixes non-nvidia settings with nvidia-specific settings and, as a result, you might get interference between two different kinds of modules, fighting over the same ressources.
Clearly, the best answer you would get comes from meticulous experimentation (changing a single option at a time and testing the result); one of the reasosns is that the hardware configuration you have is specific to your system and what is good for one set of hardware components might not be optimal for another.
Nvidia drivers are kind of picky - it matters if you mix Mesa modules with them (the consensus would be
don't
).Maybe someone has an identical harware configuration and could provide a more precise answer.
P.S. My config:
And this is the relevant part of my
xorg.conf
:marco.righi commented on 2024-05-28 18:58 (UTC)
@Maniaxx sorry for the following question.
Which is the solution that guarantee the best performance? My solution or
GSK_RENDERER=gl
referred by your link?The referred solution
GSK_RENDERER=gl
seems not working in every case...Thanks in advance
Maniaxx commented on 2024-05-28 15:34 (UTC)
@marco.righi: see here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2159644#p2159644
marco.righi commented on 2024-05-28 11:58 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-28 12:09 (UTC) by marco.righi)
Hi, I found a bug with this driver. I tested the drive using Manjaro, EndevurOS and Xfce4. The video card is:
Using this configuration, some labels of a few applications do not appear. For example, the labels on the keys of the
gnome-calculator
are not visible.I find these solutions:
1) the use of Nouveau drivers
2) this Xorg config
By switching
Accel
totrue
the problem appears.benjarobin commented on 2024-05-26 10:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-26 10:31 (UTC) by benjarobin)
Did you update first this package, before updating your system?
You should have this version installed: nvidia-470xx-dkms 470.239.06-2. The "broken" version is: 470.239.06-1.
Otherwise, please provide the full build log, troughs a pastebin like service
IdkGoodName commented on 2024-05-26 10:11 (UTC)
Seems like the latest version is broken on my end. Getting bunch of
wait_on_bit_lock() conftest failed!
,implicit declaration of function 'phys_to_dma'
and such in header files likeconftest/function.h
,inc/nv-linux.h
header files when installing. It was fine before updating (though, last update prior was a few months ago, so no idea which version may have summoned that).« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 41 Next › Last »