Maybe CFLAGS are different? when Googling fprintf_chk
I saw mentions of *_chk
versions of functions being ones that checks for stack overflows...
The incompatibility seems to come from musl implementing this differently...
as mentioned at: https://stackoverflow.com/a/55246403/1563584
so this made me remember I recently merged my makepkg.conf.pacnew which moved -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
from CPPFLAGS to CFLAGS. (I've got [testing] enabled.)
Maybe that caused it to be actually used by gcc and that made the glibc-compiled library incompatible with musl-libc-compiled stuff?
Pinned Comments
Morganamilo commented on 2022-02-20 18:30 (UTC)
There's now a custom repo and binaries again. Though only for x86_64 currently.
Custom Repo
Pre compiled binaries
https://pkgbuild.com/~morganamilo/pacman-static/x86_64/bin/