Package Details: pandoc-bin 3.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pandoc-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pandoc-bin
Description: Conversion between documentation formats
Upstream URL: https://pandoc.org
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Conflicts: pandoc-cli
Provides: pandoc, pandoc-cli
Submitter: cdkitching
Maintainer: a821
Last Packager: a821
Votes: 309
Popularity: 1.64
First Submitted: 2017-10-03 08:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-06 10:31 (UTC)

Dependencies (9)

Required by (330)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

cdkitching commented on 2023-09-22 09:07 (UTC)

Using this package will waste instead of save disk space if:

  • You're a haskell developer and need the shared libraries/compilers/etc. anyway.
  • You have >10 other statically-linked haskell packages around the same size as Pandoc (in which case you'll get a saving from making them all dynamically linked).

Neither of these scenarios is particularly likely.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 10 Next › Last »

chueewowee commented on 2024-08-20 11:06 (UTC)

Ah thanks, yes I'm reassured. That works!

a821 commented on 2024-08-20 07:08 (UTC)

@chueewowee: perhaps you meant pandoc -D latex? the default templates are located in /usr/share/pandoc/data/templates

chueewowee commented on 2024-08-19 22:23 (UTC)

Could you tell me how I could pull in the default template files?

$ pandoc -D tex Could not find data file templates/default.tex

thanks

dylif commented on 2024-07-07 02:28 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-07 02:28 (UTC) by dylif)

Thanks for updating the package. Truly appreciated :)

dylif commented on 2024-06-20 14:12 (UTC)

Any reason this package isn't being updated? It seems there are people willing to take over maintaining it.

emk2203 commented on 2024-04-18 08:06 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-18 08:07 (UTC) by emk2203)

Until package is updated to 3.13:

$ diff -u PKGBUILD.{old,new}
--- PKGBUILD.old        2024-04-18 10:00:24.029195906 +0200
+++ PKGBUILD.new        2024-04-18 09:56:11.506353366 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 pkgname=pandoc-bin
-pkgver=3.1.12.2
+pkgver=3.1.13
 pkgrel=1
 pkgdesc="Pandoc - executable only, without 750MB Haskell depends/makedepends"
 url="https://pandoc.org"
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@
 source_x86_64=("$pkgname-bin-$pkgver.tar.gz::https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/download/${pkgver}/pandoc-${pkgver}-linux-amd64.tar.gz")
 source_aarch64=("$pkgname-bin-$pkgver.tar.gz::https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases/download/${pkgver}/pandoc-${pkgver}-linux-arm64.tar.gz")

-sha256sums=('f22f18fe008641fd3fccddb040c3747efd57fad669df6ca41f4926421f317bd2')
-sha256sums_x86_64=('40da725277f7617d045fc761b0375b3ba0990c5d03a908c207fed61b78e34986')
-sha256sums_aarch64=('9032b273aec5a1050b2e5f724c8a9dcaf657540c68e44dc477ec9fc38aebc173')
+sha256sums=('e00265e5aa56ecb214d12fd7781e87d77abf101dd8d02e15c4d648ad50a5ef80')
+sha256sums_x86_64=('db556c98cf207d2fddc088d12d2e2f367d9401784d4a3e914b068fa895dcf3f0')
+sha256sums_aarch64=('678c09ac4227c88b491f6e75491e6da871fd08d79b8c0f0ee37b611f01ad3d25')

 package() {
   cd "${srcdir}/pandoc-${pkgver}"

OctopusET commented on 2024-04-02 07:36 (UTC)

Would you update the package? Or I can help you maintaining this package.

alerque commented on 2024-02-09 19:18 (UTC)

This package is correctly set to conflict with pandoc-cli, but it has a couple of other issues. The conflict with pandoc is currently meaningless since there is no such package, that is the name of a virtual provides and as such is not something one can conflict with. Also this provides pandoc which is okay for transitioning from the old naming, but it should also provides=("pandoc-cli=$pkgver") to correctly operate as a stand in replacement for that package.

tee commented on 2024-01-09 11:53 (UTC)

Can you add me as a maintainer so I can help with updating this package?

cdkitching commented on 2023-09-22 09:07 (UTC)

Using this package will waste instead of save disk space if:

  • You're a haskell developer and need the shared libraries/compilers/etc. anyway.
  • You have >10 other statically-linked haskell packages around the same size as Pandoc (in which case you'll get a saving from making them all dynamically linked).

Neither of these scenarios is particularly likely.