Package Details: parsedmarc 8.17.0-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/parsedmarc.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: parsedmarc
Description: Python package and CLI for parsing aggregate and forensic DMARC reports
Upstream URL: https://github.com/domainaware/parsedmarc
Keywords: aggregate analyze analyzer cli dmarc forensic parse parsing python report reports rpt tls tlsrpt visualize visualizer
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Submitter: flacks
Maintainer: dpeukert
Last Packager: dpeukert
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2018-08-23 21:39 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-13 23:05 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

dpeukert commented on 2025-01-06 00:35 (UTC)

All dependency related problems should now be fixed, but I haven't got around to fully testing the functionality, let me know if you run into any problems.

dpeukert commented on 2025-01-06 00:30 (UTC)

The PKGBUILD for this package is hosted here (contributions are welcome!): https://gitlab.com/dpeukert/pkgbuilds/tree/main/parsedmarc

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

micwoj92 commented on 2025-01-13 20:26 (UTC)

libxml2 and libxslt deps are not needed

dpeukert commented on 2025-01-06 00:35 (UTC)

All dependency related problems should now be fixed, but I haven't got around to fully testing the functionality, let me know if you run into any problems.

dpeukert commented on 2025-01-06 00:30 (UTC)

The PKGBUILD for this package is hosted here (contributions are welcome!): https://gitlab.com/dpeukert/pkgbuilds/tree/main/parsedmarc

micwoj92 commented on 2023-11-17 22:12 (UTC)

This currently does not run due to old python-elasticsearch version in repos. You'd have to: 1. install this elastic-transport python module (I see no sense in uploading it since it is required when python-elasticsearch will be eventually updated in repos). 2. build 8.11.0 of python-elasticsearch.

I've also changed download to pypi, because upstream has no tags and I find this commit based download bad, that also means no docs and tests.

piater commented on 2022-07-03 18:06 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-03 18:08 (UTC) by piater)

To fix the bad escape \d at position 7 bug leading to empty reports:

In PKGBUILD:

  • In depends, replace dateparser>=... by dateutil.
  • Add dateutil.patch to source, and 30e7d94081110b3e77882f673c6914429b99332adabf806b5a92432ee5a03df019ca3b4c4990573553231b3aefc1d4c778437cb3f9fcbb387e8ae96c0c4ca31d to sha512sums.

To PKGBUILD add:

prepare() {
    cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$_commit"
    patch --strip=1 --input=$srcdir/dateutil.patch
}

Add a file dateutil.patch containing:

diff --unified --recursive --text parsedmarc.orig/parsedmarc/utils.py parsedmarc.new/parsedmarc/utils.py
--- parsedmarc.orig/parsedmarc/utils.py 2020-11-25 15:36:39.000000000 +0100
+++ parsedmarc.new/parsedmarc/utils.py  2022-07-03 18:18:10.559619785 +0200
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 import logging
 import os
 from datetime import datetime
+from datetime import timezone
 from datetime import timedelta
 from collections import OrderedDict
 import tempfile
@@ -17,7 +18,7 @@
 import mailbox
 import re

-import dateparser
+from dateutil.parser import parse as parse_date
 import dns.reversename
 import dns.resolver
 import dns.exception
@@ -239,12 +240,9 @@

     human_timestamp = human_timestamp.replace("-0000", "")
     human_timestamp = parenthesis_regex.sub("", human_timestamp)
-    settings = {}

-    if to_utc:
-        settings = {"TO_TIMEZONE": "UTC"}
-
-    return dateparser.parse(human_timestamp, settings=settings)
+    dt = parse_date(human_timestamp)
+    return dt.astimezone(timezone.utc) if to_utc else dt


 def human_timestamp_to_timestamp(human_timestamp):

android commented on 2021-03-21 02:06 (UTC)

python-codecov is still missing. I just commented it out in the PKGBUILD (in python-mailsuite too) Any idea what the consequences of no python-codecov are?

ashpie commented on 2021-02-02 14:43 (UTC)

python-codecov seems to have been deleted from the AUR. Any idea why? Is there a way to install it from another source?

bjo commented on 2021-01-03 20:15 (UTC)

Feel free to adopt the package :)

thomas_niphba commented on 2021-01-03 16:54 (UTC)

I have created an updated PKGBUILD for version 6.12.0. I would like to share with you.

flacks commented on 2019-09-01 23:39 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-01 23:40 (UTC) by flacks)

lilmike, I have not tested parsedmarc with Python requirements explicitly marked as lesser-than versions, but we can induce that there are API incompatibilities with the newer libraries. Its not difficult to build the older/newer versions of Python packages not in the AUR - see the ABS, and, in the case of older packages, the respective packages' Git history. In my case, as of this writing, I haven't run into system-wide issues with the older/newer Python libraries.

1 2 Next › Last »