I was unable to build this on a clean system because I forgot to install the base-devel group.
As far as i can tell the missing pkgconf package was the culprit, but i did not verify that.
TLDR: this PKGBUILD is missing some makedepends!
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/paru.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | paru |
Description: | Feature packed AUR helper |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/morganamilo/paru |
Keywords: | AUR helper pacman rust wrapper yay |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
Submitter: | Morganamilo |
Maintainer: | Morganamilo |
Last Packager: | Morganamilo |
Votes: | 982 |
Popularity: | 19.64 |
First Submitted: | 2020-10-19 00:43 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-09-20 18:50 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 24 Next › Last »
I was unable to build this on a clean system because I forgot to install the base-devel group.
As far as i can tell the missing pkgconf package was the culprit, but i did not verify that.
TLDR: this PKGBUILD is missing some makedepends!
not hanifer imo, this package lacks bumps of pkgrel
and peoples has to solve errors
this is the maitainer responsability, pkgrel is not just here to be cool and stay at -1
qt5-styleplugins
do that because it's boring to investigate why a qt application suddenly fails
I have paru dumping a core with anything but this version, need to investigate.
Now that v1.11.2 is out, @hanifer you might just update the out-of-date message? It's basically the same as v1.11.1, just doing the job as bumping pkgrel
.
@hanifer In "Package Actions" there should be an option to unflag it.
Rebuild paru works. Sorry for any inconvenience. How could I undo the 'flagged out-of-date'?
got the same, this works as a hotfix: sudo pacman -S openssl-1.1
Anyone having the 'libssl.so.1.1' missing error, you just have to re-build paru and it should work just fine.
@TheBill2001 No. This is a source package. It only depends ob the user if it needs a rebuild or not.
Should the pkgrel
be bumped in situation like this to force a rebuild for those who install the package and unaware of the issue?
Pinned Comments
haxie commented on 2023-05-26 17:45 (UTC)
you're better off contacting her via the github, this comments section is 90% "it's out of date" from people who didn't scroll down before posting