Search Criteria
Package Details: perl-mojolicious 9.39-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/perl-mojolicious.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | perl-mojolicious |
Description: | Real-time web framework |
Upstream URL: | https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious |
Licenses: | GPL, PerlArtistic |
Submitter: | Athaba |
Maintainer: | CommodoreCrunch |
Last Packager: | CommodoreCrunch |
Votes: | 57 |
Popularity: | 0.000989 |
First Submitted: | 2010-07-15 08:25 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-23 22:40 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- perl (perl-gitAUR)
- perl-cpanel-json-xs (optional) – Faster JSON encoding and decoding
- perl-role-tiny (optional) – Role support
Required by (27)
- convos-git
- get_iplayer
- get_iplayer-git
- perl-json-validator
- perl-module-release (make)
- perl-mojo-jwt
- perl-mojo-mysql
- perl-mojo-pg
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-authentication
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-authorization
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-basicauthplus
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-bcryptsecure
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-bcryptsecure (make)
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-canonicalurl
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-canonicalurl (make)
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-i18n
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-oauth2
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-openapi
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-renderfile
- perl-mojolicious-plugin-toto
- Show 7 more...
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
Martchus commented on 2020-11-14 20:46 (UTC) (edited on 2020-11-14 20:46 (UTC) by Martchus)
Please keep the tests. Upstream might test against different versions of dependencies so it is best to run tests after building the package. Tests can be easily skipped via
makepkg
's--nocheck
flag if they are not wanted.The build time of this package is actually not very long, even with the checks. But if you really want to avoid it, my binary repo contains this package: https://martchus.no-ip.biz/repo/arch/ownstuff
realh commented on 2020-11-14 20:30 (UTC)
Is there any chance you could skip the tests in the package build? They take far more time than all the other stages in upgrading the package put together, and it gets updated fairly often. I would have thought the tests should be unnecessary for end users as long as they've passed upstream and the package dependencies etc are correct.
zebulon commented on 2018-03-18 07:36 (UTC)
Well this is bizarre, this morning the package has compiled fine. The tst wich failed yesterday t/mojo/ioloop.t is now succeeding.
zebulon commented on 2018-03-17 20:24 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-17 20:26 (UTC) by zebulon)
Test fails on my machine:
t/mojo/ioloop.t ............................ 32/?
Failed test 'stream has been resumed'
at t/mojo/ioloop.t line 246.
Failed test 'full message has been written'
at t/mojo/ioloop.t line 248.
got: undef
expected: 'works!'
Looks like you failed 2 tests of 50.
Test Summary Report
t/mojo/ioloop.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 50 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 33, 35 Non-zero exit status: 2 Files=97, Tests=10890, 27 wallclock secs ( 0.69 usr 0.03 sys + 20.43 cusr 0.99 csys = 22.14 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/97 test programs. 2/10890 subtests failed.
Anyone else sees that?
dracorp commented on 2017-09-25 19:54 (UTC)
magnade commented on 2017-08-26 01:50 (UTC)
jnbek commented on 2017-08-09 15:18 (UTC)
Yurashina commented on 2017-08-08 10:44 (UTC)
kyndair commented on 2017-07-31 15:40 (UTC)
zebulon commented on 2017-05-07 21:56 (UTC)
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »