Search Criteria
Package Details: plasma6-runners-tmux 0.0.6-3
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/plasma6-runners-tmux.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | plasma6-runners-tmux |
| Description: | Searches running tmux sessions and attaches to them |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/janbuchar/krunner-tmux-sessions |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Replaces: | plasma-runners-tmux |
| Submitter: | Teyras |
| Maintainer: | Teyras |
| Last Packager: | Teyras |
| Votes: | 0 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2024-07-23 20:52 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-07-23 21:00 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- krunner (krunner-gitAUR)
- tmux (tmux-tcl-gitAUR, tmux-xdg-gitAUR, tmux-sixel-gitAUR, tmux-gitAUR)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- extra-cmake-modules (extra-cmake-modules-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
Ashark commented on 2024-07-23 21:04 (UTC)
I too. I think that for this to happen, we should better discuss it in a proper place, the wiki mentions some: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Getting_involved
Teyras commented on 2024-07-23 21:02 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-23 21:02 (UTC) by Teyras)
Sure, let's have it that way. This is exactly the reason I'd love to have PRs here - I imagine many maintainers submit to the AUR once in a blue moon and don't want to study the submission guidelines each time. Having other people review PKGBUILDs is a waste of time for both parties.
Ashark commented on 2024-07-23 20:57 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-23 20:58 (UTC) by Ashark)
This is generally to preserve the git history of the package and aur comments.
As this package is rather new, and there is no useful comments to preserve, you can find it would be quicker to submit a brand new aur package, and just file a deletion request for this one. I imagine it would be handled quicker, as you own the package.
Also, you should not add the previous package to the conflicts array. Instead, add it to replaces array. See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines
Teyras commented on 2024-07-23 20:54 (UTC)
@Ashark okay, done. I wish that AUR had pull requests.
Ashark commented on 2024-07-23 20:50 (UTC)
@Teyras In the article I linked:
Teyras commented on 2024-07-23 20:46 (UTC)
@Ashark How exactly am I supposed to rename the repo? I made the changes to the PKGBUILD but it gets rejected by a server-side hook.
Ashark commented on 2024-07-23 20:19 (UTC)
This package needs to be ranamed following naming guidelines from https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/KDE_package_guidelines#KF_package_naming