AUR (en) - pycharm-professional

Search Criteria

Package Details: pycharm-professional 2025.1-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	pycharm-professional
Description:	Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL:	https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords:	development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses:	custom
Submitter:	hippojazz
Maintainer:	Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager:	Xavier
Votes:	292
Popularity:	0.36
First Submitted:	2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-04-17 13:27 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

pycharm-professional

Description:

Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition

Upstream URL:

https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/

Keywords:

development editor ide jetbrains python

Licenses:

custom

Submitter:

hippojazz

Maintainer:

Xavier (37h4n)

Last Packager:

Xavier

Votes:

292

Popularity:

0.36

First Submitted:

2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2025-04-17 13:27 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .. 46 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2020-07-30 17:28 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-30 17:33 (UTC) by Xavier)

Hi @navarroaxel, good point, I set the ".0" to specify that it is the first version of the main release "2020.2", "literally" I'm not changing the package version but at the same time you're right, I'll do it for the next main release.

navarroaxel commented on 2020-07-30 11:24 (UTC)

The https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_package_guidelines#Package_versioning says that the package version "should be the same as the version released by the author". I think you should use 2020.2 without the trailing ".0".

grinderz commented on 2020-07-14 05:38 (UTC)

i'm waiting fixed updates via pkgrelease version in terminal, seems sometimes need open browser ))

Xavier commented on 2020-07-13 19:41 (UTC)

@lybin yes I know, but sometimes for some small changes or fixes it is not necessary, it can wait for the next release

lybin commented on 2020-07-13 19:25 (UTC)

Please increase pkgrel= when you make internal package changes, thanks

Xavier commented on 2020-07-13 19:21 (UTC)

Updated, thank @jheinz and sorry for that I wanted to push this small fix for the next update but I forgot to update the current shasums

jheinz commented on 2020-07-13 08:47 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-13 08:49 (UTC) by jheinz)

Hi @XavierCLL, I think since you removed that line from charm.desktop yesterday, you'll also need to change its SHA256 sum from '773f169fac40fa5df69ccf90680238524f99c42aaa2b037e78e01cfc8c545280' to 'b026ef96831448be743f86e7e44bfa676629e8c3eb418c893fd87515c06263a7' in order to fix the validity check. Thanks for your work and quick responses!

meirg commented on 2020-07-12 20:47 (UTC)

@XavierCLL Yes, that works too

Xavier commented on 2020-07-12 18:46 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-12 18:47 (UTC) by Xavier)

thanks @lybin JetBrains does not provide this desktop entry (neither the charm by default), I created it for this Archlinux package and I realized that the StartupWMClass is not necessary for the charm.desktop entry, thanks @meirg for the report it and confirm if your problem is fixed if you delete the line StartupWMClass in the /usr/share/applications/charm.desktop and running sudo update-desktop-database -q

lybin commented on 2020-07-12 17:31 (UTC)

Yes both desktop files contain wmclass "jetbrains-pycharm" if you run not through menu probably another. If @XavierCLL copied these files as is, all questions to jetbrains in bugtracker. I have experience, they answer and ready to help.