AUR (en) - pycharm-professional

Search Criteria

Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.3.3-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	pycharm-professional
Description:	Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL:	https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords:	development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses:	custom
Submitter:	hippojazz
Maintainer:	Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager:	Xavier
Votes:	293
Popularity:	1.30
First Submitted:	2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-02-14 14:54 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

pycharm-professional

Description:

Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition

Upstream URL:

https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/

Keywords:

development editor ide jetbrains python

Licenses:

custom

Submitter:

hippojazz

Maintainer:

Xavier (37h4n)

Last Packager:

Xavier

Votes:

293

Popularity:

1.30

First Submitted:

2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2025-02-14 14:54 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 46 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2023-03-13 18:34 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-13 19:04 (UTC) by Xavier)

@murchu27 and @guiastro could you please check this file: https://download.jetbrains.com/python/pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz.sha256 for me the shasum match, I'm starting to think that there are different mirrors for the same tar with different sums

guiastro commented on 2023-03-13 18:19 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-13 18:25 (UTC) by guiastro)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed charm.desktop ... Passed charm ... Passed ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! -> error making: pycharm-professional

.tar.gz error

Xavier commented on 2023-03-13 18:12 (UTC)

Hi @murchu27, I just checked and the sums are fine, then maybe your tar file downloaded is corrupted

murchu27 commented on 2023-03-13 17:46 (UTC)

Still getting the same error as @jrohwer. Did they change the tar file again?

Xavier commented on 2023-03-11 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-11 20:00 (UTC) by Xavier)

For some reason (maybe a last minute bug fixes), they changed the tar file, thanks for letting me know.

jrohwer commented on 2023-03-11 11:05 (UTC)

Checksum error when trying to build the latest version:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed
    charm.desktop ... Passed
    charm ... Passed
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
 -> error making: pycharm-professional

37h4n commented on 2023-02-15 18:41 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-15 18:41 (UTC) by 37h4n)

@XavierCLL I can help with that.

Xavier commented on 2023-02-15 00:47 (UTC)

Thanks Ethan for your contribution! I think I can include it but I don't have that architecture for testing it, could you report any future issues? that would be the only way.

37h4n commented on 2023-02-12 22:54 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-12 22:54 (UTC) by 37h4n)

I modified the PKGBUILD to add aarch64 support for 2022.3.2 for Asahi Linux users: https://bafybeiewzojopsrk5qtqhybwfth6s4ym7vrvlnmdomkc2jw4v2wha4sgeq.ipfs.kubo.sudoer.ch/?filename=2022.3.2-1.PKGBUILD (backup link)

It would be nice to see aarch64 support make its way into the main package.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 46 Next › Last »

Arch Linux User Repository