Search Criteria
Package Details: python-ninja 1.11.1.3-4
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python-ninja.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | python-ninja |
Description: | The infrastructure to build Ninja Python wheels |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/scikit-build/ninja-python-distributions |
Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
Submitter: | peippo |
Maintainer: | peippo |
Last Packager: | peippo |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.56 |
First Submitted: | 2024-05-20 08:14 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-02-20 10:44 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-build (make)
- python-hatch-fancy-pypi-readme (make)
- python-installer (make)
- python-scikit-build-core (make)
- python-setuptools-scm (make)
- python-wheel (make)
Required by (4)
- otf-hanken-grotesk (make)
- python-colbert-ai
- python-libmamba (make)
- python-xad (make)
Latest Comments
tskaar commented on 2025-02-20 11:41 (UTC)
@peippo: Ahh, I see, just as an FYI:
Maybe it's just easier to change to the git tag, i.e:
peippo commented on 2025-02-20 10:23 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-20 10:23 (UTC) by peippo)
@tskaar: it seems to be changing back and forth: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=python-ninja&id=f49d3ca064084d34076ef39154d7f21e95d18150
And the pypi source was not good for building this either, if I remember correctly (why would I have used the GitHub release, otherwise)
Let me take a look
tskaar commented on 2025-02-20 10:17 (UTC)
Checksum for v1.11.1.3 is out of date, newest one is:
cce325cfa743c43025c8bd820ee17c580241221e6974e6ffa95f28ecc23a7ffeb957359cc68e6e4acac3bf8770ccad3351795abce9443fb714794dfc00a1f5f4
peippo commented on 2025-02-10 21:54 (UTC)
@aidanstewart05: this was an issue related to how GitHub’s archives of tagged commits are not necessarily stable (tag can be deleted and re-pushed). I had pushed a new PKGBUILD version after checking that the upstream code works
aidanstewart05 commented on 2025-02-10 20:36 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-10 20:37 (UTC) by aidanstewart05)
A cleanBuild seemed to remedy the issue for me, but it could've been something else I did.
Neboer commented on 2025-01-24 05:02 (UTC)
This package failed to build. Checksum of the source is wrong.