Search Criteria
Package Details: python-pytest-recording 0.13.2-6
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python-pytest-recording.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | python-pytest-recording |
Description: | Pytest plugin to record network interactions with VCR.py |
Upstream URL: | https://pypi.org/project/pytest_recording |
Licenses: | MIT |
Submitter: | AchmadFathoni |
Maintainer: | gesh |
Last Packager: | gesh |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.51 |
First Submitted: | 2022-03-22 09:59 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-04-10 18:30 (UTC) |
Dependencies (13)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-pytest
- python-vcrpy (python-vcrpy-gitAUR)
- python-build (make)
- python-hatchling (python-hatchling-gitAUR) (make)
- python-installer (make)
- python-coverage (check)
- python-pytest (check)
- python-pytest-httpbin (check)
- python-pytest-mock (check)
- python-requests (check)
- python-werkzeug (check)
- python-pycurl (optional) – Block pycurl-based network connections
Required by (9)
- python-habanero (check)
- python-llm-openrouter (check)
- python-logfire (check)
- python-logfire-api (check)
- python-pydantic-ai (check)
- python-pydantic-ai-examples (check)
- python-pydantic-ai-slim (check)
- python-pydantic-evals (check)
- python-pydantic-graph (check)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
Drack commented on 2025-04-18 23:18 (UTC)
Hello, following my previous comment, here is a patch to the
PKGBUILD
that fix the issue with the bad directory name:Drack commented on 2025-04-11 07:17 (UTC)
Hello,
When trying to update this package as of today, I got the following error:
gesh commented on 2025-04-10 12:43 (UTC)
@medaminezghal I saw it, but thanks for keeping me posted on it. I've updated
prepare()
to use the final PR you posted for clarity's sake.medaminezghal commented on 2025-04-10 09:57 (UTC)
@gesh In the next version there is no need to use the prepare function as the problem is fixed from the PR in the GitHub and it has merged today.
gesh commented on 2025-04-04 15:15 (UTC)
Right - I ended up using your
sed
solution instead of just patching using your PR as I initially intended - upstream has diverged too far since the last release for the patch to cover all the invocations it needs to.medaminezghal commented on 2025-04-04 13:36 (UTC)
@gesh I've already done a pull requests in the GitHub
gesh commented on 2025-04-04 13:01 (UTC)
... I don't know if I invoked
makepkg
incorrectly before, but I'm seeing the failure now. It's surprising, I'll pull in your PR if I can't find the root problem.Thanks for reporting this!
medaminezghal commented on 2025-04-03 19:23 (UTC)
@gesh use makepkg -sf (with installed pretty plugin) and it will fail
gesh commented on 2025-03-30 08:54 (UTC)
@medaminezghal Can't reproduce your test failure, even on a system with python-pytest-pretty installed. Please check if
pkgctl build -c
on your system still fails.medaminezghal commented on 2025-03-18 08:11 (UTC)
@gesh you can add this prepare function to make the test run:
This make sure that pretty plugin is disbaled for the tests. Note that adding this function won't affect the tests if pretty plugin isn't installed so you can use it in every environment. If you want, try to edit the PKGBUILD file and test it in clean chroot.
1 2 Next › Last »