Package Details: python2-cffi 1.15.1-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/python2-cffi.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: python2-cffi
Description: Foreign Function Interface for Python calling C code
Upstream URL: https://cffi.readthedocs.org/
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: bionade24
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: truocolo
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.029457
First Submitted: 2022-01-08 15:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-02-08 01:42 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

bionade24 commented on 2022-01-15 21:29 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-01 19:47 (UTC) by bionade24)

This package is built by a CI/CD check it to know if the package really is broken (broken in a clean build environment) and not just on your dirty build environment. https://abs-cd.oscloud.info/cd_manager/python2-cffi

If you have problems regarding foss.heptapod.net, please reach out to contact AT heptapod DOT net instead of commenting here, a AUR maintainer is not responsible for the VCS platform the developers of the SW use.

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

drws commented on 2023-08-09 14:21 (UTC)

Please add armv7l, armv7h and aarch64 to the arch array in PKGBUILD.

dreieck commented on 2022-04-12 11:15 (UTC)

After completely deleting all sources, source verification now works for me.

drws commented on 2022-04-07 17:07 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-09 14:20 (UTC) by drws) 

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    cffi-v1.15.0.tar.bz2 ... Passed

croyleje commented on 2022-04-06 20:08 (UTC)

OK it looks like this stems from a patch (Patch #531) that was pushed about a week ago but those changes have not been released as a new numbers release as of today. The only thing I can assume is your CI is pulling directly from the repo and not from the actual release. According to there docs and repo the last release was in October of last year. If there is some other place with release information I would be happy to check into it more if you would like.

dreieck commented on 2022-04-05 11:40 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-05 11:43 (UTC) by dreieck)

Source verification fails for me:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    cffi-v1.15.0.tar.bz2 ... FAILED

My cffi-v1.15.0.tar.bz2 currently sha256sums to bad049b968e6fe40e082dd21cf49505db4ee7a15b2439a5340c0a555a294db33.

Thanks for maintaining!

croyleje commented on 2022-04-03 15:13 (UTC)

I just double checked as of April 3, 2022 @ 11:04AM EST the source downloaded from https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/cffi/-/archive/v1.15.0/cffi-v1.15.0.tar.bz2 is still shows the older checksum (920f0d66a896c2d99f0adbb391f990a84091179542c205fa53ce5787aff87954) I guess it is possible the update has not made it to heptapod servers yet but according to there logs the last change was made around October 21, 2021 (Date could be wrong recalling from memory). I am assuming it is just that that updated version has not made it to the server yet but I was more interested in where you found the new sums.

bionade24 commented on 2022-04-03 14:31 (UTC)

@croyleje: I'm a bit confused. Yes, I updated the checksum. And as of today, the tarball downloaded by my CI matches the checksum. https://abs-cd.oscloud.info/cd_manager/python2-cffi

croyleje commented on 2022-04-02 23:53 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-03 00:09 (UTC) by croyleje)

The PKGBUILD SHA256 checksum is out of date the updated checksum is 920f0d66a896c2d99f0adbb391f990a84091179542c205fa53ce5787aff87954 I understand you will want to verify this yourself but as of April 2, 2022 @ 7:51PM EST this is correct checksum. Thank you for your work and for maintaining this package.

I see you recently updated the sums if it was recently updated maybe heptapod hasn't updated yet?

bionade24 commented on 2022-04-01 19:42 (UTC)

@serxxx Your comments is just full of incorrent statements, it's hard to indentify what you actual problems are. Heptapod is constantly down for some down detectors, so they aren't a valid source. Some website status checkers report heptapod down right now while I can access it perfectly fine. If you have issues with heptapod, please contact the heptapod admins.

bionade24 commented on 2022-04-01 19:35 (UTC)

@ABelliquex Yes, abs-cd.oscloud.info was down. But this has nothing to do with the issues you and others have with heptapod regarding DNSSEC. Only thing that was broken was the checksum, which I changed now, after validating upstream did this officially. You don't need abs-cd.oscloud.info in any regard to install or update this package, it's just the CD for my Arch repo.

1 2 Next › Last »