Search Criteria
Package Details: reportbug 13.0.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/reportbug.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | reportbug |
Description: | A tool designed to make the reporting of bugs in Debian and derived distributions relatively painless |
Upstream URL: | https://salsa.debian.org/reportbug-team/reportbug |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | python-reportbug |
Provides: | python-reportbug |
Submitter: | JonnyJD |
Maintainer: | BenTheTechGuy |
Last Packager: | BenTheTechGuy |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2013-02-12 18:18 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-02-29 03:22 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- apt (zypper-gitAUR, zypperAUR)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-aptAUR
- python-debian
- python-debianbtsAUR
- python-setuptools (make)
- sensible-utilsAUR (sensible-utils-gitAUR) (optional) – default editor
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
sparr commented on 2024-09-21 01:23 (UTC)
The script is capable of using a local SMTP server to relay the bug report email, instead of the common fallback behavior of using Debian's public bug-only SMTP server. You could run a local SMTP server that holds outgoing mail instead of delivering it, then inspect the outbox after reportbug sends something.
micwoj92 commented on 2024-09-21 01:00 (UTC)
I wonder how to actually test this package without sending additional bugs.
sparr commented on 2024-09-21 00:54 (UTC)
I do not have sensible-utils installed
micwoj92 commented on 2024-09-21 00:27 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-21 00:28 (UTC) by micwoj92)
I had similar issue submitting, but in my case it didn't even have text in the body of message, so I had to send mail with the description myself. Did you have sensible-utils installed?
sparr commented on 2024-09-20 23:56 (UTC)
I used reportbug to submit a bug report today. I entered some text at the "Briefly describe the problem (max. 100 characters allowed). This will be the bug email subject [...]' prompt, which was accepted without error.
This eventually led to submitting https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082434 which was sent with no subject.
I'd wager this misbehavior doesn't exist when running the package on debian, so I suspect the problem is arch-specific.
micwoj92 commented on 2024-07-25 18:55 (UTC)
MarsSeed commented on 2023-06-19 13:31 (UTC)
I think this should now optdepend on sensible-editor instead of the whole suite of sensible-utils. (The latter, formerly unified package has been split into subpackages.)
BenTheTechGuy commented on 2022-02-02 03:12 (UTC)
Looks like I've been made maintainer of this package… I guess the maintainer quit. I've rewritten the package and it's now up to date with proper dependencies.
BenTheTechGuy commented on 2022-02-01 03:57 (UTC)
@tuxayo, I have now packaged python-debianbts so there are no more missing dependencies. However, the package is out of date and thus the source no longer exists. It's changed a lot since 2017, so updating it would almost be a rewrite. To get the package to build with the old version, you can change the source to the latest Debian Snapshot with this version of the package still available:
1 2 Next › Last »