This package should provide and conflict with rofi-pass
Search Criteria
Package Details: rofi-pass-git 502.4fdd367-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/rofi-pass-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | rofi-pass-git |
Description: | bash script to handle pass storages in a convenient way |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/carnager/rofi-pass |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | Rasi |
Maintainer: | Rasi |
Last Packager: | Rasi |
Votes: | 5 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2015-05-22 21:42 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2018-07-05 14:58 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- gawk (gawk-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR)
- pass (pass-gitAUR, pass-parcelliteAUR, gopass-symlinksAUR)
- pwgen
- rofi (rofi-lbonn-wayland-only-gitAUR, rofi-gitAUR, rofi-lbonn-wayland-gitAUR, rofi-wayland)
- xclip (wl-clipboard-x11AUR, xclip-gitAUR)
- xdg-utils (busking-gitAUR, xdg-utils-slockAUR, mimiAUR, mimi-gitAUR, xdg-utils-handlrAUR, openerAUR, xdg-utils-mimeoAUR, mimejs-gitAUR)
- xdotool (xdotool-gitAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- passed-gitAUR (optional) – change fieldnames in password files
Required by (0)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
silverbluep commented on 2019-10-04 21:57 (UTC)
Rasi commented on 2017-09-20 15:28 (UTC)
This is a -git package. Just because there are new commits in the repository it does not mean this package is out of date. Just rebuild the package. Some AUR helpers need a -devel switch or similar.
Rasi commented on 2016-02-03 19:27 (UTC)
thanks
rumpelsepp commented on 2016-02-03 07:09 (UTC)
Due to pacman 5.0:
:: Checking rofi-pass-git integrity...
==> ERROR: install should not be an array
Rasi commented on 2015-12-12 22:55 (UTC)
@pigmonkey: should work fine and i updated the dependency
pigmonkey commented on 2015-12-12 21:07 (UTC)
Does this actually depend on rofi-git or will it work with the version of rofi in community (currently 0.15.11)?
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/rofi/
Rasi commented on 2015-08-21 05:24 (UTC)
Thanks, updated
TrialnError commented on 2015-08-21 00:21 (UTC)
Shouldn't xdg-utils at least be in optdepends? Since it will be called if $BROWSER is not set and I didn't see it being pulled as an indirect dep
Pinned Comments
Rasi commented on 2017-09-20 15:28 (UTC)