Package Details: rpcs3 0.0.36-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rpcs3.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rpcs3
Description: An open-source PlayStation 3 emulator/debugger written in C++
Upstream URL: https://rpcs3.net
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: vitaliikuzhdin
Maintainer: vitaliikuzhdin
Last Packager: vitaliikuzhdin
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.83
First Submitted: 2024-09-21 15:49 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-03-31 13:32 (UTC)

Required by (0)

Sources (19)

Latest Comments

vitaliikuzhdin commented on 2025-03-31 13:32 (UTC)

@jbreizh, fixed.

jbreizh commented on 2025-03-31 12:01 (UTC)

Hello, i can't compile the 36 version :

CMake Error at 3rdparty/hidapi/hidapi/CMakeLists.txt:1 (cmake_minimum_required): Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake.

Update the VERSION argument <min> value. Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier.

Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.

FabioLolix commented on 2025-03-04 21:55 (UTC)

Not sure what you're trying to imply with your response.

That don't exist a stable version and this should be re-uploaded as rpcs3-alpha, for the same reason there isn't a stable ruffle pkgbuild because there isn't a stable ruffle version

You're passing this a as a stable version which isn't true

vitaliikuzhdin commented on 2025-03-04 21:33 (UTC)

@FabioLolix, I don’t see the benefit of using the $pkgname-$branch naming convention when there’s only one branch. As for the official repositories, that was obvious -- I mentioned it to emphasise my argument. Not sure what you're trying to imply with your response.

FabioLolix commented on 2025-03-04 21:16 (UTC)

Since there aren't stable builds and these are alpha versions this should be re-uploaded as rpcs3-alpha

official Arch repositories (core, extra, etc.) do not support VCS packages. If this package were ever to gain enough popularity for inclusion in the official repositories

Highly doubt it will land in the official while in alpha even if it become the most popular AUR pkgbuild

AniLeo commented on 2025-02-16 19:24 (UTC)

Please read our release notes at https://github.com/RPCS3/rpcs3/releases/ and remove this AUR.

This is only causing more confusion on users as they'll be mislead into getting an outdated version from here - that by the way, won't work for Netplay, as we do not allow old clients into RPCN - instead of our official AUR at rpcs3-git.

You're offering a random outdated build that had no special quality control whatsoever compared to every other build.

I leave a copy of the relevant line from our release notes below, just in case.

Note: These are NOT stable builds. RPCS3 is a rolling release software without stable builds. These are random tags we do from time to time. Do NOT use the branch from these tags to package RPCS3.

vitaliikuzhdin commented on 2025-01-29 13:10 (UTC)

@dekart811, no, the sdl2 dependency is correct since sdl2-compat already provides sdl2. Even more so, sdl2-compat replaces sdl2, meaning that by default, pacman will prefer it but will still give you the option to choose between both if you want to. The same applies to zlib and zlib-ng-compat, for example.