Package Details: rtrlib 0.8.0-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rtrlib.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rtrlib
Description: RPKI-RTR client library
Upstream URL: https://github.com/rtrlib/rtrlib
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: mroethke
Maintainer: mroethke
Last Packager: mroethke
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2017-02-02 15:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-18 13:01 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

neo_chen commented on 2025-04-10 15:14 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-10 15:23 (UTC) by neo_chen)

Build failed with newer CMake & failed tests:

CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:5 (cmake_minimum_required):                                                                                                                                                              
  Compatibility with CMake < 3.5 has been removed from CMake.                                                                                                                                                          

  Update the VERSION argument <min> value.  Or, use the <min>...<max> syntax                                                                                                                                           
  to tell CMake that the project requires at least <min> but has been updated                                                                                                                                          
  to work with policies introduced by <max> or earlier.                                                                                                                                                                

  Or, add -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5 to try configuring anyway.

Failed Tests:

Running tests...
Test project /home/neo_chen/.cache/yay/rtrlib/src/rtrlib-0.8.0
Connected to MAKE jobserver
      Start  1: test_pfx
 1/10 Test  #1: test_pfx .........................   Passed    0.36 sec
      Start  2: test_trie
 2/10 Test  #2: test_trie ........................   Passed    0.00 sec
      Start  3: test_ht_spkitable
 3/10 Test  #3: test_ht_spkitable ................   Passed    0.61 sec
      Start  4: test_ht_spkitable_locks
 4/10 Test  #4: test_ht_spkitable_locks ..........   Passed    1.00 sec
      Start  5: test_live_validation
 5/10 Test  #5: test_live_validation .............***Failed    2.00 sec
      Start  6: test_ipaddr
 6/10 Test  #6: test_ipaddr ......................   Passed    0.00 sec
      Start  7: test_getbits
 7/10 Test  #7: test_getbits .....................   Passed    0.00 sec
      Start  8: test_dynamic_groups
 8/10 Test  #8: test_dynamic_groups ..............***Failed    1.00 sec
      Start  9: test_packets_static
 9/10 Test  #9: test_packets_static ..............   Passed    0.00 sec
      Start 10: test_packets
10/10 Test #10: test_packets .....................   Passed    0.00 sec

80% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 10

Total Test time (real) =   4.98 sec

The following tests FAILED:
          5 - test_live_validation (Failed)
          8 - test_dynamic_groups (Failed)

mroethke commented on 2024-06-18 13:02 (UTC)

done

Frankkkkk commented on 2024-06-18 12:47 (UTC)

Ah, interesting, makes sense; I got my semantics wrong. Well, so if you could add armv7h and armv7l that'd be great :-) Thanks

mroethke commented on 2024-06-18 12:41 (UTC)

Sure.

rtrlib is compiled from C to an architecture specific binary. If you compile this binary for ARM you cannot use it on x86 and vice versa. With a properly specified arch array pacman will prevent you from installing a package build for arm on x86. If I specify "any" pacman will not do that, because it thinks the package can be used on any architecture.

Frankkkkk commented on 2024-06-18 12:27 (UTC)

Can you explain the "containing compiled binaries" part please ? I don't really understand: isn't rtrlib compiled?

For the arch, at least armv7h. Thanks

mroethke commented on 2024-06-18 12:19 (UTC)

Any should never be specified on a package containing compiled binaries, because it would indicate that the build package can be installed on any architecture.

I would be happy to add desired architectures though.

Frankkkkk commented on 2024-06-18 10:26 (UTC)

Hi mroethke, could you change the architectures and specify any instead? The lib seems well built and works on armv7h and others, so I see no reason to restrict to the actual ones. Thanks!

mroethke commented on 2020-11-06 11:41 (UTC)

done

Undated4 commented on 2020-11-04 15:02 (UTC)

Please add aarch64 as a supported platform.

deconf commented on 2019-08-08 09:28 (UTC)

Thank you for your reminding, I am using --mflags --nocheck successfully installed the software