Package Details: sddm-git 0.21.0.14.gae072f9-4

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sddm-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sddm-git
Description: The Simple Desktop Display Manager
Upstream URL: https://github.com/sddm/sddm
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Conflicts: sddm
Provides: display-manager, sddm
Submitter: aavci
Maintainer: sir_lucjan
Last Packager: sir_lucjan
Votes: 73
Popularity: 0.95
First Submitted: 2013-01-20 09:53 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-08 06:17 (UTC)

Dependencies (20)

Required by (66)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-03-01 20:11 (UTC)

I don't think there is a "qt5" package anymore, so this has to depend on the qt5 packages form [extra] (qt5-base, …) it needs.

aavci commented on 2013-03-01 13:15 (UTC)

Dependency changed from qt to qt4.

jleclanche commented on 2013-03-01 11:48 (UTC)

Dependency should be changed from qt to qt4.

msx commented on 2013-02-17 05:45 (UTC)

Congratz!

aavci commented on 2013-02-16 17:56 (UTC)

I am happy to tell that, now all of the installed themes work with both Qt4 and Qt5. Qt5 versions are a little more polished (proper mouse cursor and wheel support) but both versions work fine. BTW, elarun and maui themes are merged to the main repo and installed by default, too.

aavci commented on 2013-02-14 04:15 (UTC)

Probably we can install only the themes that can run e.g Circles for qt4, Maldives for qt5. We already configure the config file to select the correct theme on installation. So it wouldn't be a split package but just some cmake wizardry. Themes installed by the user.. that is another story.

msx commented on 2013-02-14 01:39 (UTC)

I personally don't mind to have Qt5 installed from AUR (about 200Mb extra) until KDE embraces it as it's defautl Qt version, something that will certainly don't occur 'til the end of the year or beginning of the next year, IIRC. However I figure out that some users will be happy with the Qt4/QtQuick1 framework so -may be- a split package approach may do it if it isn't too much burden for the team to support two different versions of SDDM. Cheers.