@tka: yes, see the patch coming from a pull request. In general, use plain makepkg and avoid AUR helpers and more specifically when there is an error.
Search Criteria
Package Details: seafile 9.0.11-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/seafile.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | seafile |
Description: | An online file storage and collaboration tool |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/haiwen/seafile |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Conflicts: | seafile-server |
Provides: | seafile-client-cli |
Submitter: | eolianoe |
Maintainer: | Joffrey |
Last Packager: | Joffrey |
Votes: | 111 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2016-08-11 16:38 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-14 17:06 (UTC) |
Dependencies (8)
- fuse (fuse2)
- libevent (libevent-gitAUR)
- libsearpcAUR
- libwebsockets
- python-future
- sqlite (sqlite-fossilAUR)
- intltool (make)
- vala (vala-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (2)
Sources (2)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 47 Next › Last »
eolianoe commented on 2018-11-12 19:51 (UTC)
tka commented on 2018-11-12 13:33 (UTC) (edited on 2018-11-12 13:33 (UTC) by tka)
@MadMe
Your approach went through fine. Thank you. :)
Is this a known issue?
MadMe commented on 2018-11-08 12:53 (UTC) (edited on 2018-11-08 12:54 (UTC) by MadMe)
@tka you can use the normal aur install routine... what i did: i let pikaur install the dependencies
pikaur -Syu seafile-client
error came CTRL+C prevents pikaur to remove the packages.
git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/seafile.git
makepkg -si
Here came the error again. i removed the line 1139 in src/seafile-6.2.5/daemon/http-tx-mgr.c
and i used makepkg -sie to install it. After that
pikaur -Syu seafile-client
installed the client package.
tka commented on 2018-11-08 07:57 (UTC) (edited on 2018-11-08 07:57 (UTC) by tka)
Using Antergos 18.11 I get an error during the install process:
http-tx-mgr.c:1139:5: Error: Duplicate duplicate case value
case CURLE_SSL_CACERT:
^~~~
If I remove the mentioned case statement, a manually induced "make install" seems to run fine. Of course, it is not installed properly in pamac after this.
Any hints?
paapereira commented on 2018-09-06 19:32 (UTC)
@hopimet updated and working. Thanks!
hopimet commented on 2018-09-05 19:36 (UTC) (edited on 2018-09-05 19:38 (UTC) by hopimet)
@paapereira, for the client only, seafile + seafile-client + ccnet-server works fine. So ccnet is not needed anymore.
If someone has a problem to update due to the previous dependency to ccnet, the solution is: 1) sudo pacman -Rdd seafile 2) reinstall seafile (for instance: yaourt -S seafile)* 3) then update (for instance: yaourt -Syua)
*yaourt can be replaced with your preferred AUR package installer. Reinstalling seafile will replace ccnet by ccnet-server.
eolianoe commented on 2018-09-05 19:21 (UTC)
@paapereira: that should be fixed with the 6.2.4 version (I'll totally drop ccnet in the next releases)
paapereira commented on 2018-09-04 19:53 (UTC)
For the client side only I was using "ccnet+seafile+seafile-client" as in:
"https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccnet
Joffrey commented on 2018-02-09 15:32 (edited on 2018-02-09 15:33 by Joffrey)
@eolianoe You're right, I could rename the headers .. and propose something to upstream but if it is not accepted it will be time lost. So for the next update:
CLIENT = ccnet + seafile + seafile-client
SERVER = ccnet-server + seafile-server + seahub"
Given that it is not possible to have both seafile and ccnet-server installed together... whats the client side correct configuration?
pvagner commented on 2018-09-02 11:08 (UTC) (edited on 2018-09-02 11:18 (UTC) by pvagner)
Currently this package depends on ccnet, however ccnet is in conflict with ccnet-server. So it is not possible to have both seafile and ccnet-server installed together. Either seafile should depend on ccnet-server or ccnet-server should have provides ccnet included in its PKGBUILD script. Ooops: seafile is no longer needed for seafile-server. So I presume packages without server suffix are client side stuff or something...
pitlochry commented on 2018-07-10 17:39 (UTC)
checksums are still wrong, but thanks for all your effort
Pinned Comments