Search Criteria
Package Details: sing-geoip-db 20241012-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sing-geoip.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | sing-geoip |
| Description: | GeoIP Database for sing-box |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-geoip |
| Licenses: | CC-BY-SA-4.0, GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Provides: | sing-geoip |
| Submitter: | everyx |
| Maintainer: | everyx (lilac) |
| Last Packager: | lilac |
| Votes: | 3 |
| Popularity: | 1.29 |
| First Submitted: | 2022-09-16 02:53 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-10-12 13:41 (UTC) |
Dependencies (0)
Required by (7)
- nekoray (requires sing-geoip) (optional)
- nekoray-bin (requires sing-geoip) (optional)
- nekoray-git (requires sing-geoip)
- sing-box (requires sing-geoip) (optional)
- sing-box-alpha (requires sing-geoip) (optional)
- sing-box-beta (requires sing-geoip) (optional)
- sing-box-git (requires sing-geoip) (optional)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
neovic commented on 2024-09-18 14:15 (UTC)
rule-set的包sha256sum校验码是错的，麻烦纠正下
everyx commented on 2024-08-31 07:17 (UTC)
When I was thinking about renaming today, I remembered that when I first created the package, I did consider the naming issue。
According to the AUR submission guideline[^1], using
-binhas a condition that says “when the sources are available”.But in this case, the upstream is actually a compilation tool, not 'the sources', This tool automatically fetches the necessary data, including v2fly/domain-list-community and MaxMind's GeoLite2 dataset, and creates geoip and geosite data files specifically for sing-box.
So, it doesn't really fit the situation. Based on that, I think it makes more sense to stick with the current naming.
[1]: > Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix. An exception to this is with Java. The AUR should not contain the binary tarball created by makepkg, nor should it contain the filelist.
xiota commented on 2024-08-30 06:21 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-30 06:21 (UTC) by xiota)
Thank you for explaining. When you rename with
-binsuffix, please downgrade to the last unretracted release.Similar rename applies to the
sing-geositepackages?everyx commented on 2024-08-29 01:45 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-29 03:29 (UTC) by everyx)
@xiota
Yeah, that's true. I used to compile it from the source code, but I switched it up to save some time. I'll change it back later.Edit: I just remembered why I made that change. Since
sing-geoip/geositerepo stores the build tools instead of the compiled files, if we don’t distribute the release binaries, we could end up with different binaries being generated at different times. For non-gitpackages, that shouldn’t really happen. So, I’ll find some time to rename the package to-bin.xiota commented on 2024-08-28 15:12 (UTC)
This package should have
-binsuffix or build from source, like-gitpackage.everyx commented on 2024-08-28 09:12 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-28 09:13 (UTC) by everyx)
@xiota 上游 20240812 版本发布后又撤销了，你可以用上一个版本的 PKGBUILD https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=sing-geoip&id=2665482582ecb05bb1c475a89f05968b452b784c
xiota commented on 2024-08-28 07:20 (UTC)
Fails to build.
everyx commented on 2024-01-06 06:18 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-06 06:19 (UTC) by everyx)
@ZhangHua Considering compatibility and package size, Maybe split it into
sing-geoip-rule-setandsing-geoip-db, and I'll take the time to see how it can be more in line with Arch's packaging principlesZhangHua commented on 2024-01-06 03:31 (UTC)
Hello, sing-box v1.8.0 has been released and SagerNet wants to use Rule Set to replace Geoip and Geosite. See here for more info.
So the question is that are you planing to package those
.srsfiles which are generated together with geoip and geosite in thesing-geoipandsing-geositepackages?1 2 Next › Last »