Package Details: sonarr-bin 4.0.14.2939-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sonarr-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sonarr-bin
Description: Smart PVR for newsgroup and torrent users
Upstream URL: https://sonarr.tv
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Groups: servarr-bin
Conflicts: sonarr
Provides: sonarr
Submitter: txtsd
Maintainer: txtsd (fryfrog)
Last Packager: txtsd
Votes: 104
Popularity: 1.11
First Submitted: 2024-10-13 20:06 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-03-17 19:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (20)

Required by (17)

Sources (8)

Pinned Comments

mkomko commented on 2024-11-15 06:59 (UTC)

PSA: If you receive exceptions like "System.IO.IOException: Read-only file system" when Sonarr is importing files after updating to 4.0.10.2544, and you use your home directory for downloaded files (which is advised against), you can either move file management out of your home directory or do something like the following:

$ sudo systemctl edit sonarr

[Service]
# Allow home directory path to be writable again
ReadWritePaths=/home/user/media

txtsd commented on 2024-10-21 03:56 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-30 12:50 (UTC) by txtsd)

Alternate versions

sonarr (source version of this package)
sonarr-develop (develop branch)
sonarr-develop-bin (binary version of the develop branch)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next › Last »

degeberg commented on 2015-06-06 13:57 (UTC)

I'm sorry I've been away for the last couple of weeks and left the package outdated in the mean time. Hopefully people that needed an update will have figured out editing the version number in the PKGBUILD file. The package should now be up to date with the latest upstream version. I'll see about incorporating SAKUJ0's suggested change during this weekend.

johannvonperfect commented on 2015-06-05 13:58 (UTC)

Upstream has been updated again to 2.0.0.3212.

justin8 commented on 2015-04-13 22:35 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for querying these things. Sometimes packagers overlook simple solutions to things and its helpful. Glad you got a chance to learn something as well.

SAKUJ0 commented on 2015-04-13 11:58 (UTC)

@justin8 I just wanted to add how right you were about /usr (maybe even more right than you would expect). https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_filesystem_hierarchy https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards This does not belong into /opt and I would say write permissions inside /usr are not an option. Props to you and degeberg. Thanks to you guys I have learned something.