Search Criteria
Package Details: sourcegit-bin 8.41-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sourcegit-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | sourcegit-bin |
Description: | GUI client for GIT users |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/sourcegit-scm/sourcegit |
Keywords: | git git-gui |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | sourcegit |
Provides: | sourcegit |
Submitter: | yataro |
Maintainer: | yataro |
Last Packager: | yataro |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.91 |
First Submitted: | 2024-05-08 15:41 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-02 05:14 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR)
- xdg-utils (busking-gitAUR, xdg-utils-slockAUR, mimiAUR, mimi-gitAUR, xdg-utils-handlrAUR, openerAUR, xdg-utils-mimeoAUR, mimejs-gitAUR)
- desktop-file-utils (desktop-file-utils-gitAUR) (make)
- git-credential-managerAUR (git-credential-managerAUR, git-credential-manager-binAUR) (optional) – third-party authentication support
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
yataro commented on 2024-11-04 03:56 (UTC)
I've decided to make
git-credential-manager
an optional dependency this update because it's only needed when using user:password authentication on third-party resources (like GitHub), but if you're using an ssh key, this is completely avoided.yataro commented on 2024-08-19 20:07 (UTC)
Good catch, fixed it
chust commented on 2024-08-19 17:26 (UTC)
deb now use zstd, so in prepare function, the data.tar.xz should be data.tar.zst
SoftExpert commented on 2024-07-27 09:00 (UTC)
Good point about the DEB automatically handled by makepkg, I will pay attention on this. Anyway, thank you for considering my proposal !
yataro commented on 2024-07-27 06:38 (UTC)
I've refactored the pkgbuild to use the .deb package, thanks @SoftExpert!
In your original patch, you extract the already extracted .deb (which is extracted by makepkg) and later extract the already extracted data.tar.xz, just to let you know why it doesn't look exactly as you suggested.
yataro commented on 2024-07-27 05:47 (UTC)
Yes, I know how to handle this properly, I just don't like it. Your argument about size is enough for me, will do that in the meantime.
SoftExpert commented on 2024-07-27 04:52 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-27 04:53 (UTC) by SoftExpert)
For me there are 2 arguments:
the size (AppImage is 21819712 bytes, while the DEB is 16049836 bytes)
my own personal preference towards the binaries clearly stored in a folder instead of the overhead of the AppImage :)
As for the management of the revision, it can be easily handled with a variable like this
_binrev
:edit: fixed a typo
yataro commented on 2024-07-27 03:37 (UTC)
@SoftExpert
When using DEB packages, the package revision must be taken into account. Although it will probably always be
1
for SourceGit, I chose AppImage to save myself the trouble.If you can tell me why AppImage is worse than deb, I will refactor the package accordingly.
SoftExpert commented on 2024-07-26 20:38 (UTC)
With this PKGBUILD I can install from the DEB package ...
sourcegit.desktop
needs to be adjusted to this:SoftExpert commented on 2024-07-26 17:45 (UTC)
Why not use the DEB package instead of AppImage ?
1 2 Next › Last »