Search Criteria
Package Details: systemd-numlockontty 0.1-14
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/systemd-numlockontty.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | systemd-numlockontty |
Description: | Systemd service + script, automatically activate numpad on ttys |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/Ybalrid/systemd-numlockontty |
Keywords: | numlock service systemd tty |
Licenses: | GPL |
Replaces: | numlockontty |
Submitter: | Ybalrid |
Maintainer: | Ybalrid |
Last Packager: | Ybalrid |
Votes: | 93 |
Popularity: | 0.21 |
First Submitted: | 2013-01-02 23:36 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-10-24 11:43 (UTC) |
Dependencies (1)
- systemd (systemd-chromiumosAUR, systemd-gitAUR, systemd-fmlAUR, systemd-selinuxAUR, sysupdated-systemd-gitAUR)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
codyg commented on 2023-05-25 15:42 (UTC)
I have the same issue as @gimix311 and @FuelFlo - though @FuelFlo seems to no longer have the issues...
When I get to my display manager/login screen, after installing this package, the numlock light on my keyboard is on, but pressing the keys causes home/end/pgup/pgdown/etc to happen as if numlock is off.
The first time I press numlock, the light stays on but numlock actually works. Pressing it again turns the light and functionality off. So it's completely identical behavior to what happens without this package, except the light is on at first.
laba commented on 2022-11-19 18:29 (UTC)
any solution ?
jvybihal commented on 2022-10-26 07:10 (UTC)
Including
$pkgrel
in upstream (github tag/release) seems like a bad idea to me.pkgrel
is related to package, not the source. Very often, the packager and upstream dev(s) are completely different persons that do not even know about each other.If you make upstream changes, just bump the version up. And adjust PKGBUILD accordingly.
Or instead of pulling .tar.gz, just use git:
source=('git+https://<repo-url>#[commit|tag|branch]=<ref>')
You should be able to use specific commit, tag, etc. in the PKGBUILD.
Hope that clears some things out.
LRitzdorf commented on 2022-10-26 00:24 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-26 00:25 (UTC) by LRitzdorf)
@Ybalrid I'm very much not a
makepkg
expert, but that seems like it would solve the issue? However, I've also checked on a few other AUR packages, and most of them don't seem to include the release in their source names, so I'm really not sure what the correct course of action is. There has to be a packagers' mailing list or something that you can ask, right?In case you'd like to test this out yourself, you can remove and then touch
numlockontty-0.1.tar.gz
(so that it exists but doesn't have the correct MD5 sum), then try to build the package, or justmakepkg --verifysource
.Ybalrid commented on 2022-10-25 15:57 (UTC)
@LRitzdorf
I had no idea people could run into that issue...!
Would it be wise to put the
$pkgrel
in the name of the tarball ?LRitzdorf commented on 2022-10-25 14:58 (UTC)
Just a quick note for anyone seeing a "failed downloading sources" error: since the source file's name includes only the package version (and not the release),
makepkg
might find the source tarball for a previous release, try to use that, and then fail the validity check. The solution, of course, is to remove the old tarball and runmakepkg
again.Ybalrid commented on 2022-10-24 11:43 (UTC)
okay, I have confirmed my fix is working on a fresh VM that does boot without display manager, you can type numbers in the login prompt without activating the numlock
pushing update now
jvybihal commented on 2022-10-24 11:29 (UTC)
@Ybalrid thanks. Just fyi, I have noticed it, because my numlock on tty stopped working :D So the script with setleds works fine (at least for me) :)
Ybalrid commented on 2022-10-24 11:22 (UTC)
@jvybihal
whoops, I put the wrong service file in there I guess. Gonna update this an push it later today. Sorry for breaking it
jvybihal commented on 2022-10-24 06:45 (UTC)
@Ybalrid Hi, the
.service
file included in github repo callsExecStart=/usr/local/bin/numlock
but the script is correctly installed/usr/bin/numlockOnTty
. Since you do do patch .service in PKGBUILD, it results in nonworking unit after pkgrel upgrade.1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »