Search Criteria
Package Details: tera-cli 0.5.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/tera-cli.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | tera-cli |
Description: | CLI to make one-off Tera templating easier |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/guangie88/tera-cli |
Keywords: | templating tera |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | teracli |
Submitter: | powerofzero |
Maintainer: | powerofzero |
Last Packager: | powerofzero |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000002 |
First Submitted: | 2022-01-09 21:49 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-02-17 03:03 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- cargo (rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
Latest Comments
alerque commented on 2023-02-17 10:03 (UTC)
The AUR naming could be fixed and given to the most likely candidate for a given name. I could even take care of that change (as a TU), but I'm not convinced it is called for here. There is not a clear win over which project is more canonical, and this one the one you packaged is registered on crates.io as
tera-cli
. Te other one that I packaged is registered there asteracli
(presumably because the former was taken). Both projects install binaries calledtera
and have their GitHub repos calledtera-cli
, which makes it all really confusing. I think for the time being I would leave the AUR packages like this following the crates.io naming of each project. If that ever changes we can follow suite here, or if it becomes much more clear that one project is dead and the other lives on then we might go ahead too, but I think it is too early to make that call.powerofzero commented on 2023-02-17 03:08 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up, and I've pushed an update. I was actually not aware of the chevdor/tera-cli project, and while I'm no longer actively using either tera-cli so I can't test it, chevdor/tera-cli seems to supersede guangie88/tera-cli, so I would also be interested in migrating this name to that project, if that is something that is possible in the AUR. I am not familiar with AUR policies and procedures around this though and atm I do not have time to research it. If you have insight that would be appreciated.
alerque commented on 2023-02-16 11:13 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-16 11:14 (UTC) by alerque)
Not to be confused with teracli, a similar project of nearly the same name. I've added a
conflicts=()
tag to teracli but it might be worth adding here too.