Search Criteria
Package Details: topgrade 16.0.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/topgrade.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | topgrade |
| Description: | Upgrade all the things |
| Upstream URL: | https://topgrade-rs.github.io |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Submitter: | darwish |
| Maintainer: | yochananmarqos (s34m) |
| Last Packager: | yochananmarqos |
| Votes: | 65 |
| Popularity: | 1.22 |
| First Submitted: | 2018-06-10 09:51 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-10-12 18:12 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- cargo (rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »
micwoj92 commented on 2022-11-28 20:53 (UTC)
No need to install gpl3 license as it is already provided by licenses package.
Needs to depend on gcc-libs.
Please also read rust packaging guidelines for small improvements that can be done https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Rust_package_guidelines#Prepare
randomnerd commented on 2022-11-04 11:17 (UTC)
Oops, sorry for the flag, apparently they removed the update again.
s34m commented on 2022-11-03 15:34 (UTC)
Should work now
zara86 commented on 2022-11-02 16:12 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-03 07:37 (UTC) by zara86)
Still broken... you (dotto) have edited the pkgver but not source and sha256sum. Read the Iparcq post.
Moo-Crumpus commented on 2022-11-01 17:46 (UTC)
Iparcq is right.
lparcq commented on 2022-11-01 12:41 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-01 12:41 (UTC) by lparcq)
The URL has changed too (refs/tags).
pkgver=10.0.1
source=("$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz::$url/archive/refs/tags/v$pkgver.tar.gz")
sha256sums=('908ec302fda3a0549e49c4c19f1e3e2cbaba08dd8b7301c59370569a86a9f09a')
duckunix commented on 2022-11-01 11:54 (UTC)
Can we get the version changed to 10.0.1 then? As this fails to be build, running the command kinda does not work since it cannot up grade itself....
Bricklou commented on 2022-10-31 21:01 (UTC)
@yochananmarqos yes my bad, only the version have a problem since the 10.1.0 isn't available on github
yochananmarqos commented on 2022-10-31 18:34 (UTC)
@Bricklou: There's nothing wrong with the source() array. Upstream tagged 10.1.0 earlier, but they since pulled it.
Bricklou commented on 2022-10-31 18:33 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-31 18:33 (UTC) by Bricklou)
Hey, the PKGBUILD is wrong !
First, the
sourcefield should be like this:source=("${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz::${url}/archive/refs/tags/v${pkgver}.tar.gz")And the
pkgverfield is10.0.1not10.1.0!« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »