Search Criteria
Package Details: upak 10.6.8-11
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/upak.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | upak |
Description: | HRIBF Data Acquisition and analysis. |
Upstream URL: | ftp://ftp.phy.ornl.gov/pub/upak/README.html |
Licenses: | unknown |
Submitter: | donpicoro |
Maintainer: | donpicoro (effeffe) |
Last Packager: | effeffe |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2012-03-03 00:38 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-11-04 11:50 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- bash (bash-devel-static-gitAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, bash-gitAUR)
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- tcsh (tcsh-gitAUR)
- gcc-fortran (gcc-fortran-gitAUR, gcc11-fortranAUR, gcc-fortran-snapshotAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
effeffe commented on 2024-06-17 15:04 (UTC)
Sure thing, maybe let's put a symlink to /usr/local so that radware does not break for now
/effeffe
donpicoro commented on 2024-06-17 14:13 (UTC)
I found a less sketchy one at the ORRUBA (the Oak Ridge Rutgers University Barrel Array) website : https://orruba.org/software/
I think we want to avoid using /usr/local/. I remember " my" PKGBUILD did that... maybe we can give it another stab at it...
/Pico
effeffe commented on 2024-06-17 13:35 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-17 13:44 (UTC) by effeffe)
Hey,
I have found the program source referenced on
https://jensa.ornl.gov/solstise/
, but it is a tarball uploaded to google drive:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Iu8belOH6a1hiAHyN21aB9clMK8FcVha/view?usp=sharing
I've made a repo on github with the last source dump I installed on my machine, downloaded on the 1st of April of this year:
https://github.com/effeffe/upak
If most people are fine with this, I'll update the source with thisCheers /effeffe
edit: can anyone check the files I have uploaded to the repo? I am comparing these with the google drive version, and there are a few files which are different
donpicoro commented on 2024-06-17 08:21 (UTC)
I have not managed to get a new online source for this package... Does anyone have a clue on where to get it?
Otherwise I'm afraid we should delete this package.
/Pico
yjun commented on 2023-10-26 02:43 (UTC)
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines#Package_etiquette
haonanxixixi commented on 2023-10-26 01:32 (UTC)
@effeffe @donpicoro Thanks a lot.
effeffe commented on 2023-10-25 16:35 (UTC)
The issue about hhirf.pro is well known. Currently, I'm trying to fix but didn't really had the time. We need a tach on one install file to set it to look for the file in srcdir rather than the target folder.
If you need it to urgently compile, please make a symlink to the required file.
Wip
donpicoro commented on 2023-10-25 10:07 (UTC)
OK, I can reproduce the error. I'll have a look into it with some low priority at the moment. Maybe @effeffe can also have a look.
/Pico
haonanxixixi commented on 2023-10-25 02:15 (UTC)
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/haibara_ai/.cache/paru/clone/upak/src/Dtxx'
Cannot open header file - /usr/local/hhirf/doc/hhirf.pro ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
error: failed to build 'upak-10.6.8-11':
error: packages failed to build: upak-10.6.8-11
I'm having some issues like above
1 2 3 Next › Last »