Search Criteria
Package Details: upd72020x-fw 1:1.0.0-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/upd72020x-fw.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | upd72020x-fw |
Description: | Renesas uPD720201 / uPD720202 USB 3.0 chipsets firmware |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware |
Keywords: | firmware uPD720200 uPD720201 uPD720202 xhci_pci |
Licenses: | custom |
Submitter: | redchenjs |
Maintainer: | ZombieJesus9k |
Last Packager: | redchenjs |
Votes: | 150 |
Popularity: | 4.52 |
First Submitted: | 2020-08-21 15:45 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-09-04 15:12 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
broller commented on 2025-04-08 16:53 (UTC)
@birbkeks attempted it on a burner computer and the sha512 hashes pass and install correctly.
birbkeks commented on 2025-04-06 20:03 (UTC)
original github page (https://github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware) is removed so aur package gives 404 error, i found this backup github page for it, i dont know if its safe or not.
https://github.com/mahatmus-tech/uPD72020x-Firmware
gothicVI commented on 2025-04-06 09:13 (UTC)
aic94xx-firmware recently switched to archive.org: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=aic94xx-firmware&id=e5895cd76575e3764520e1dd961afdec7e1976c3 I'm still not convinced this couldn't be a solution for the time being.
abouvier commented on 2025-04-04 19:43 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-04 19:43 (UTC) by abouvier)
The real source should be the official Windows installer for the driver that contains this firmware. And it should be extracted in the
prepare
function.gothicVI commented on 2025-04-04 19:10 (UTC)
@ZombieJesus9k a valid concern. However, my claim is that there's no need for a different hash for the same file. Independent of where it's hosted.
ZombieJesus9k commented on 2025-04-04 16:44 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-04 16:44 (UTC) by ZombieJesus9k)
@gothicVI I think that deftclaw was expressing his concern that (established 1996) wasn't a reliable host for this externally hosted file and that perhaps someone should upload it to yet another GitHub so that it may stand the test of time and not just randomly disappear and break the package. Given the circumstances surrounding the breakage that has occurred I commend him for his forward thinking. Archive.org doesn't even give the impression that it would be a proper place to refer back to a static file as if it were some sort of organization dedicated to archiving the Internet. I have personally uploaded a copy to my Geocities page for redundancy should anyone need it.
gothicVI commented on 2025-04-04 15:30 (UTC)
@deftclaw at the danger of repeating myself again: there's no need to change the hash. The original file is still accessible via https://web.archive.org/web/20240316231746if_/https://codeload.github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware/tar.gz/refs/tags/1.0.0
The maintainer only needs to update the url. That's all and I don't understand why @redchenjs hasn't done so.
deftclaw commented on 2025-03-31 20:25 (UTC)
@gothicVI, @xolider, @rechenjs, probably prudent to have a trusted maintainer upload the archive to github, then update the hash. That way the package doesn't rely on the url structure whims of web.archive.org.
This isn't orphaned is it?
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »