Package Details: vesktop-electron 1.5.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/vesktop-electron.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: vesktop-electron
Description: An Electron-based Discord app with Vencord & improved Linux support using system provided electron. Unsupported
Upstream URL: https://github.com/Vencord/Vesktop
Licenses: GPL-3.0-only
Conflicts: vesktop
Provides: vesktop
Submitter: Covkie
Maintainer: Covkie
Last Packager: Covkie
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.67
First Submitted: 2024-09-24 22:21 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-06 03:32 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

Required by (3)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Covkie commented on 2025-01-15 22:21 (UTC)

Do NOT report an issues with this package upstream. This package uses system/latest electron. Any issues you have MUST be reproducible in the Flatpak or vesktop packages

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

Covkie commented on 2025-01-24 16:29 (UTC)

@ninetailedtori these packages use nodejs corepack pnpm for building. adding pnpm to the dep array is pointless

ninetailedtori commented on 2025-01-23 20:03 (UTC)

Please add https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/pnpm/ or the AUR bin https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pnpm-bin to the dependencies.

Covkie commented on 2025-01-15 22:21 (UTC)

Do NOT report an issues with this package upstream. This package uses system/latest electron. Any issues you have MUST be reproducible in the Flatpak or vesktop packages

chrrybmb commented on 2024-12-14 04:14 (UTC)

This package should use electron33 instead of electron. Using unsupported electron versions can cause issues, and such issues will lead to upstream bug reports.

Muflone commented on 2024-10-01 22:22 (UTC)

since EinfxchFinn abandoned the package, then it's pretty clear he doesn't intend to maintain this package anymore.

@Covkie feel free to submit a new merge request to remove this package

Muflone commented on 2024-09-28 16:09 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-28 16:45 (UTC) by Muflone)

@Covkie

We'll remake vesktop-electron and submit the merge request again. Please let me know if there's a better way to handle this.

This is a great way to having your profile suspended

https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/MS6LW6Q3PPEZ2ZM5U2LDV77TDOF6I2ZW/

if you want to take over the vesktop_electron package ask for permission to the vesktop_electron package

Muflone commented on 2024-09-28 16:07 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-28 16:45 (UTC) by Muflone)

@Covkie why did you uploaded this package again after it was deleted for being a duplicate of the older vesktop_electron package?

https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/MS6LW6Q3PPEZ2ZM5U2LDV77TDOF6I2ZW/

if you want to take over the vesktop_electron package ask for permission to the vesktop_electron package

Covkie commented on 2024-09-23 00:14 (UTC)

hello @EinfxchFinn Vesktop maintainers are taking over packaging for the aur. We will be maintaining system electron packages for users who want them.

This package should be merged into vesktop-electron as that is the naming scheme we will be using. @Muflone I think you did not understand this when you deleted vesktop-electron? https://github.com/vencord/pkgbuilds. We'll remake vesktop-electron and submit the merge request again. Please let me know if there's a better way to handle this.

herock commented on 2024-06-28 00:26 (UTC)

The latest PKGBUILD revisions don't seem to be compatible with pnpm provided by corepack. I'm using pnpm provided by the https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yarn-pnpm-corepack package.

UsageError: No version specified for pnpm@ in "packageManager" of package.json

As workaround, maybe remove the entire packageManager line? Corepack will default to the latest stable pnpm in this case. There's also COREPACK_ENABLE_STRICT=0 but I'm not sure if pnpm itself will respect this flag when used without corepack.

1 2 3 Next › Last »