Package Details: vis-git 0.7.1.r31.g73401a3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/vis-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: vis-git
Description: modern, legacy free, simple yet efficient vim-like editor - git checkout
Upstream URL: https://github.com/martanne/vis#vis-a-vim-like-text-editor
Keywords: editor
Licenses: custom:ISC
Conflicts: vis
Provides: vis
Submitter: eworm
Maintainer: eworm
Last Packager: eworm
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2014-09-13 21:43 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-12-02 21:47 (UTC)

Dependencies (16)

Required by (11)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

sekret commented on 2014-09-15 11:59 (UTC)

Hi, the correct path for the license has to be for the whole pkgname, including the -git. So it should be install -D -m0644 LICENSE ${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/vis-git/LICENSE or install -D -m0644 LICENSE ${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE

sekret commented on 2014-09-14 17:35 (UTC)

Just now I thought of it again and yes, you are right, the leading 0 does indeed make sense :D Mmmmmh, do I now have to adjust my packages?! Damn :D

eworm commented on 2014-09-14 11:59 (UTC)

- Could you remove this leading "0." in the pkgver? This just doesn't make any sense! It does make sense. ;) If first tag is added you will get something like "0.0.1.r0-g...". pacman upgrade should still work then. If I remove the leading "0." I have to add epoche later. - Is this license really called "as-is"? I just said "custom" and provided the license file. Hmm, "custom" makes sense... (I did not yet install the lincesnse file as "make install" is currently broken. Will add that. - For the category I'd use "editors", because that's what it is! Sure. I do forget that for every new package... Thanks! - The package definitely depends on ncurses, please add it as a dependency. Ok. Thanks for your notes!

sekret commented on 2014-09-14 08:52 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to upload my PKGBUILD, but then I saw it's already done by you. Some notes: - Could you remove this leading "0." in the pkgver? This just doesn't make any sense! - Is this license really called "as-is"? I just said "custom" and provided the license file. - For the category I'd use "editors", because that's what it is! - The package definitely depends on ncurses, please add it as a dependency.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2