Package Details: wechat 1:5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/wechat.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: wechat
Description: Fixes and optional sandbox for WeChat.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/Kraftland/portable
Keywords: binary qt sandbox universal wechat
Licenses: GPL3
Provides: wechat-beta-bwrap, wechat-bwrap, wechat-portable, wechat-sandbox-provider, wechat-universal-bwrap, wechat-uos-bwrap, wechat-uos-qt
Replaces: wechat-bwrap
Submitter: Kimiblock
Maintainer: Kimiblock
Last Packager: Kimiblock
Votes: 47
Popularity: 4.70
First Submitted: 2024-06-30 11:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-20 09:44 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (2)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

Kimiblock commented on 2024-12-31 16:40 (UTC)

WeChat will soon split into 2 packages. While wechat-bin will be the new "vanilla" version, this package will revert back to the original state and automatically set env vars for input method, HiDPI and more. The sandbox will still remain optional in this package, though.

Kimiblock commented on 2024-11-13 11:11 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-07 07:10 (UTC) by Kimiblock)

右键应用程序图标可与微信共享文件. 其将被放置在沙盒的 ~/Shared 中.

WeChat_Data/portable.env 中的环境变量将会自动导入至微信.

不支持纯 Wayland 环境, 微信并未构建 Wayland 模块.

Kimiblock commented on 2024-11-13 11:09 (UTC)

若要查看使用手册, 访问 https://wiki.archlinuxcn.org/wiki/WeChat

For user manual and internal document, consult https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WeChat

st0ne commented on 2024-07-27 16:00 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-31 04:35 (UTC) by st0ne)

KDE Plasma 添加阴影

1.添加阴影

在微信界面，ALT+F3 -> 更多操作 -> 配置特殊窗口设置 -> 添加属性 -> 添加 外观和修正 下面的 无标题栏和边框 -> 将 初始状态应用 改为 强制，将后面的 是 切换称 否 -> 应用

2.去除标题栏

之后微信就有边框阴影了，但是微信多了个标题栏。

设置 -> 颜色和主题 -> 窗口装饰元素 -> 找到你在用的主题右下角的编辑 -> 切换到 特定窗口优先规则 -> 添加 -> 检测窗口属性... -> 选中微信窗口 直到 匹配正则表达式 那里出现 wechat -> 勾选 装饰选项 下面的 隐藏窗口标题栏 -> 确定 -> 应用

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 56 Next › Last »

njpig commented on 2025-01-22 09:58 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-22 09:59 (UTC) by njpig)

仅仅更新了portable-git，问题依然存在。

$ yay -Q | grep portable

portable-git r270.2365afe-1

Kimiblock commented on 2025-01-22 09:25 (UTC)

portable 2.10.2 已发布, 请帮忙测试是否解决问题

Kimiblock commented on 2025-01-22 08:33 (UTC)

@njpig 还是有问题的话先到 https://github.com/Kraftland/portable 开个新 issue, 里面贴上 journalctl --user -eu WeChat --grep "received a" 的输出 (需要触发一次打开文件)

njpig commented on 2025-01-22 08:13 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-22 08:14 (UTC) by njpig)

安装完portable-git后，问题仍然存在。即使卸载portable-git, wechat-bin，wechat后，再重新安装，问题依然存在。是我的操作有问题？

$ pacman -Q | grep portable

portable-git r268.240107f-1

$ pacman -Q | grep -i wechat

wechat 1:5-1

wechat-bin 4.0.1.11-2

Kimiblock commented on 2025-01-22 06:07 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-22 06:32 (UTC) by Kimiblock)

@njpig

KIO 有 bug, 尝试 portable-git

njpig commented on 2025-01-22 04:00 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-22 04:04 (UTC) by njpig)

微信中点击右键菜单中的“在文件夹中显示“，出现错误: WorkingDirectory= expects an absolute path or '~'

  1. KDE Plasma Version: 6.2.5
  2. wechat 1:5-1
  3. wechat-bin 4.0.1.11-2
  4. portable 2.9.0-1

Kimiblock commented on 2025-01-20 09:52 (UTC)

XDG Desktop Portal has done a breaking change which requires a bwrapinfo.json file to be present for sandboxed apps. Please upgrade you system and portable, wechat package to fix this problem.

Kimiblock commented on 2025-01-08 08:02 (UTC)

卸载 wechat 相关包后重新安装

mario commented on 2025-01-08 02:24 (UTC)

更新报错：

error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: unable to satisfy dependency 'wechat-bin' required by wechat -> error installing: [/home/mario/.cache/yay/wechat/wechat-1:4-3-any.pkg.tar.zst] - exit status 1 error installing: [/home/mario/.cache/yay/wechat/wechat-1:4-3-any.pkg.tar.zst /home/mario/.cache/yay/wechat-bwrap/wechat-bwrap-2:1-1-any.pkg.tar.zst] - exit status 1

请问应该如何处理？

aliu commented on 2025-01-05 04:26 (UTC)

And here's what I wrote:

I don't understand what you mean. Kimiblock has been the maintainer of wechat-uos-qt and wechat-bwrap-something since I started using arch a year ago. The merged "wechat" is just one less package, and the vanilla “原汁原味儿” wechat-bin was already restored 4 days ago. I don't understand all the uproar. If you don't want the wechat sandbox fixes, then just don't use that.

Agree that the package could be renamed to something like "wechat-fixed-sandbox" though.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 56 Next › Last »