Package Details: wine-wow64 10.1-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/wine-wow64.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: wine-wow64
Description: A compatibility layer for running Windows programs
Upstream URL: https://www.winehq.org
Keywords: wine winehq wow64 x64
Licenses: LGPL-2.1-or-later
Conflicts: wine
Provides: wine
Submitter: tiziodcaio
Maintainer: tiziodcaio (xiota)
Last Packager: xiota
Votes: 39
Popularity: 0.86
First Submitted: 2023-05-06 18:16 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-12 17:52 (UTC)

Dependencies (41)

Required by (379)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

xiota commented on 2024-05-22 12:10 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-23 05:13 (UTC) by xiota)

This package is still relevant because multilib/wine does not have wow64 mode enabled and/or has not dropped lib32 depends.

Hanabishi commented on 2024-05-22 11:55 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-22 12:01 (UTC) by Hanabishi)

@dreieck, https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/releases/wine-9.0#wow64

TLDR: with new WoW64 mode, you can run 32-bit Windows apps on pure 64-bit Linux system, i.e. without multilib/lib32-* dependencies installed.

tiziodcaio commented on 2023-09-11 14:58 (UTC)

Added wine-staging-wow64, the wine-wow64 package with staging patches!

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last »

gdebure commented on 2024-04-23 04:38 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-23 04:39 (UTC) by gdebure)

Well, it looks like the original makepkg.conf from pacman 6.1 uses these LDFLAGS:

LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
         -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs"

(source : https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/pacman/-/blob/6.1/makepkg.conf?ref_type=heads)

I will try building in a clean chroot.

xiota commented on 2024-04-22 22:29 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-22 22:30 (UTC) by xiota)

Why is it trying to use lld? Do you have LDFLAGS and other variables set somewhere else? Try building in clean chroot.

gdebure commented on 2024-04-22 19:47 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-22 19:48 (UTC) by gdebure) 

# Make a backup of my makepkg.conf
sudo mv /etc/makepkg.conf /etc/makepkg.conf.back
# Reinstall pacman to recover original makepkg.conf
sudo pacman -S pacman
# Compare files
diff /etc/makepkg.conf /etc/makepkg.conf.back

Results in 

< #MAKEFLAGS="-j2"
---
> MAKEFLAGS="-j20"

Relaunched makepkg -is but exactly the same output. What am I doing wrong ?

gdebure commented on 2024-04-22 19:34 (UTC)

@xiota, hmmm this is strange, to my knowledge the only change I made was to uncomment this line to allow parallel compilation:

MAKEFLAGS="-j20"

I will restore the original file from the package and see what happens.

xiota commented on 2024-04-22 04:52 (UTC)

@gdebure The -fuse-ld=lld in your output indicates makepkg.conf has been modified. This package builds successfully in a clean chroot.

gdebure commented on 2024-04-22 04:34 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-22 04:54 (UTC) by gdebure)

I get the following message when installing on a fresh archlinux install:

...
checking whether the compiler supports -Wl,--export-dynamic... yes
checking whether the compiler supports -static-pie... yes
checking for x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc... x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc
checking whether x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc works... yes
checking whether x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc supports -target x86_64-w64-mingw32 -fuse-ld=lld  --no-default-config... no
checking whether x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc supports -target x86_64-w64-mingw32 -fuse-ld=lld ... no
checking for x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc option to enable C99 features... unsupported
configure: error: x86_64 PE cross-compiler supporting C99 not found.
This is an error since --enable-archs=x86_64 was requested.

It is not clear to me what I should install prior to installing wine-wow64. Should something more be listed as build dependencies ?

Hanabishi commented on 2024-03-16 17:52 (UTC)

@kby, you are doing it wrong, read https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Makepkg#Improving_build_times

It took me 4m 38s on Ryzen 7700X with all 16 threads utilized and building on tmpfs ramdisk.

6b6279 commented on 2024-03-09 18:28 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-09 18:30 (UTC) by 6b6279)

Any tips to decrease compilation time? I've tried -j8 for the make call in build(), but that didn't make it any faster. Right now, the entire process takes about an hour for me.

xiota commented on 2024-03-09 05:49 (UTC)

@yan12125 I've moved sane and samba to makedep/optdep.

lav commented on 2024-03-06 19:18 (UTC)

Dear Daniele, Can you please check wine64 issue: https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/pull/2191

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last »