Search Criteria
Package Details: xilinx-ise 14.7-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xilinx-ise.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | xilinx-ise |
Description: | Xilinx ISE Design Suite |
Upstream URL: | https://www.xilinx.com/products/design-tools/ise-design-suite.html |
Licenses: | custom |
Submitter: | cyrozap |
Maintainer: | cyrozap |
Last Packager: | cyrozap |
Votes: | 14 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2016-03-13 04:16 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-06-04 00:18 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- libstdc++5AUR (libstdc++5-binAUR)
- ncurses5-compat-libsAUR
- openmotif
- qt4AUR
- rpcbind
- xorg-fonts-100dpi
- xorg-fonts-75dpi
- digilent.adept.utilitiesAUR (optional) – Digilent programmer support
- fxloadAUR (optional) – Firmware loader for some programmer dongles
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5
cyrozap commented on 2018-11-18 01:51 (UTC)
@alex.forencich: Maybe that could be fixed by symlinking the embedded JRE to a system version?
@wyre: Unfortunately there's no light variant of ISE, and since Xilinx considers ISE to be EOL they won't be releasing any updated versions.
chim20air commented on 2018-11-01 16:13 (UTC)
Anyone with 404 error? tried with https://aur.archlinux.org/xilinx-ise.git
jfernandz commented on 2018-10-29 23:40 (UTC)
Is there not any light version? This package is 20G large.
alex.forencich commented on 2018-05-30 09:13 (UTC)
Some components of ISE don't currently run correctly. Namely, the embedded JRE (which is used for coregen, probably among other things) is borked:
There was a suggested fix to put an old version of libm in /opt/Xilinx/14.7/ISE_DS/ISE/lib/lin64/ that worked a while ago, but now causes XST to fail with INTERNAL_ERROR:Xst:cmain.c:3423:1.29 . Removing the old version of libm fixes this, but then java doesn't work. Not sure how to fix this properly.
cyrozap commented on 2016-12-08 22:05 (UTC)
fishburn commented on 2016-12-07 03:14 (UTC)
fishburn commented on 2016-12-06 08:09 (UTC)
Jamesits commented on 2016-06-03 06:00 (UTC)
cyrozap commented on 2016-04-22 02:12 (UTC)
calcmogul commented on 2016-04-17 11:25 (UTC)
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5