Search Criteria
Package Details: xjed-snapshot 0.99.20.180-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jed-snapshot.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | jed-snapshot |
Description: | A freely available text editor - Latest development version |
Upstream URL: | http://www.jedsoft.org/snapshots/ |
Licenses: | GPL |
Conflicts: | jed, xjed |
Provides: | jed, xjed |
Submitter: | haawda |
Maintainer: | aksr |
Last Packager: | haawda |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2019-12-12 18:25 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-05-18 09:43 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- gpm (gpm-vmAUR, gpm-gitAUR)
- libxft (libxft-gitAUR)
- slang (slang-gitAUR, slang-snapshotAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR) (make)
- libxt (make)
Required by (1)
- jedstate-git (requires jed)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
kseistrup commented on 2024-01-31 15:17 (UTC)
The current
jed-snapshot.install
removes*.slc
and*.dfa
upon removal. However, this may remove other such files that other packages (notablyjedstate-git
) may have installed.jed-snapshot
should only remove its own files. This can be done by including them in the package itself and let pacman handle it.See the
PKGBUILD
of e.g.jed-git
in case of doubt.Cheers.
haawda commented on 2022-02-03 22:08 (UTC)
If you want a git package, create one. No need to merge anything.
kseistrup commented on 2022-02-03 20:33 (UTC)
@zhenya1007, before I started using this package I manualy downloaded and compiled the editor myself from the snapshots (I'm a jed user since 1994 or 1995). You can log all you want, I still prefer the snapshot. If jed-git was the only jed package available around here, I would probably accept that, but I still prefer the snapshot.
zhenya1007 commented on 2022-02-03 19:55 (UTC)
@kseistrup In the abstract, your comment might have merit. However, in the case of JED git repository, it is just silly. Why? Do a
git log --oneline -10
on the repository. I am reproducing the output below:Notice a pattern?! Yeah...
kseistrup commented on 2021-09-30 18:47 (UTC)
I, for one, would prefer to have a
jed-snapshot
package that is built from the official snapshots. I'm not interested in a traditionaljed-git
package.zhenya1007 commented on 2021-09-30 18:34 (UTC)
Would you consider modifying this PKGBUILD to pull straight from the upstream git repo?
I have done a "quick and dirty" version locally. If there is interest, maybe we can cooperate on morphing this into a jed-git PKBUILD?
haawda commented on 2021-06-13 21:50 (UTC)
@prk21: fixed @csts: no, this is quite normal for a split package.
1 2 3 Next › Last »