Package Details: zfs-linux-headers 2.3.1_6.13.8.arch1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zfs-linux
Description: Kernel headers for the Zettabyte File System.
Upstream URL: https://openzfs.org/
Keywords: kernel linux openzfs zfs
Licenses: CDDL
Conflicts: spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-headers, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-headers
Provides: spl-headers, zfs-headers
Submitter: demizer
Maintainer: lightdot
Last Packager: lightdot
Votes: 275
Popularity: 0.87
First Submitted: 2016-04-21 08:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-03-25 23:55 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

lightdot commented on 2025-02-04 21:19 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-29 20:47 (UTC) by lightdot)

This package will be kept in sync with the openzfs latest stable release and the kernels officially supported by it.

For the supported kernel versions, refer to the respective openzfs release notes (LINK).

E.g. openzfs 2.3.1 supports kernel versions 4.18 - 6.13. When kernel 6.14 is released for Arch, zfs-linux will not be updated until the openzfs project announces that it's compatible. This will most likely happen with the next openzfs release.

The kernel compatibility of the upcoming openzfs release can be seen in their META file (LINK).

For those wishing to use openzfs with unsupported kernels, do note that this could lead to serious issues, including data loss, even though such a zfs-linux package might build and install cleanly. Have reliable backups and use such a package at your peril.

Please do not mark this package as out of date without checking the kernel compatibility first. Thank you!

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 .. 79 Next › Last »

demizer commented on 2014-02-23 17:08 (UTC)

FYI, there is a problem with the archzfs repo, I am working to see what is going on. Sorry!

demizer commented on 2014-02-23 04:23 (UTC)

Ok, after a long fought battle with apache, graysky's built packages are up! You will need to locally sign his key if you are using the archzfs repo: # pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C # pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C Thank!

butler360 commented on 2014-02-09 21:19 (UTC)

Thanks to you both for this, and good luck with the surgery and recovery!

graysky commented on 2014-02-09 21:19 (UTC)

Just FYI. I am not a TU :p

demizer commented on 2014-02-09 21:11 (UTC)

Okay, good news everyone. graysky is going to push the updated packages to the demz-repo-core repo as well as updating the PKGBUILDS. So this means no one will have to update the url location of the archzfs package repos while i'm away. When the 3.13 kernel is released to core, graysky will take that opportunity to make trial run on his end for managing the ZFS packages. This includes signing the packages and database with his GPG key. Since he is a TU, there should be further intervention by users of the archzfs repository. @lucky, I know I promised to take a look at adding support for lts kernels, and I haven't... sorry about that. I will make sure I tackle it once I recover from surgery. And thank you for the kind words!

Lucky commented on 2014-02-09 02:07 (UTC)

@demizer Good luck with the surgery and a fast convalesce. We will see you in a few months back. :D @graysky & demizer Would it be possible also create a zfs package for -lts kernels? Because on "server" side i think most of us will go with a LTS kernel.

demizer commented on 2014-02-08 18:45 (UTC)

A quick update. I am emailing with graysky on him taking over for a few months while I recover. Thanks for all the support everyone!

graysky commented on 2014-02-08 12:22 (UTC)

I might have some time to take over the 4 packages while you convalesce. Email me so we can do the handoff if you wish.

demizer commented on 2014-02-08 06:01 (UTC)

Hello everyone. Unfortunately, I will be having major heart surgery in the next month that will make it difficult for me to keep up with the ZFS packages on AUR. Therefore, I am going to have to drop my maintainership of these packages. For those that may be interested in adopting these packages, here are some details: 1. ZOL is released every six months or so. Sometimes a new kernel version includes API changes that break ZOL builds. Luckily, patches are usually available in the ZOL github repo. 2. The upstream ZOL master branch is stable. ZOL has been very stable for me and has not once refused to build (except for API changes, which happen every few months). 3. There has been very little email traffic to me regarding ZFS on Arch in the last year . 4. The archzfs repository on github can be transferred to the new maintainer. 5. Build scripts exist for automatically building the packages, adding the built packages to a repo, pushing the package sources to AUR, and scraping webpages for version numbers (with email reporting). These scripts are adapted to my workflow, but they can be adapted easily to a new maintainer's workflow. 6. The demizerone.com repo will be taken down as I won't be able to keep up with it. If you are interested, just send me a note to jeezusjr@gmail.com. Sorry for having to bow out everyone. demizer

demizer commented on 2014-01-31 22:54 (UTC)

@graysky, the linux version is hardcoded in zfs/PKGBUILD and spl/PKGBUILD. So just updating the x86_64 packages won't work. :( Anyways, I have added the kludge. This breaks the linux version dependency output in AUR as you can see above "linux=" is missing the version number. This is something I wanted to avoid, but it looks like that won't be happening until AUR gets fixed. I also cleaned up the version replacement functions in my build scripts. Took about three hours, but I'm happy with everything. If anyone has any problems, leave your comments here. Thanks!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 .. 79 Next › Last »