Package Details: zfs-linux-lts-headers 2.2.7_6.6.67.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux-lts.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zfs-linux-lts
Description: Kernel headers for the Zettabyte File System.
Upstream URL: https://openzfs.org/
Licenses: CDDL-1.0
Conflicts: spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-headers, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-headers
Provides: spl-headers, zfs-headers
Submitter: demizer
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 77
Popularity: 0.33
First Submitted: 2016-04-24 19:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-20 11:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 10 Next › Last »

LazyGamble commented on 2024-11-13 12:50 (UTC)

@gromit just wanted to thank you for taking over this package, being a maintainer is often a thankless task but you have my gratitude :)

I just migrated from the unmaintained archzfs to the current lts. from 6.6.36-1 to 6.6.60-1. no issues. just had to uninstall pacman -Rns linux-lts zfs-linux-lts and re-install. no issues post installation.

gromit commented on 2024-11-09 09:23 (UTC)

Hey @McCarthee, thanks for your comment, but note that I have just started to maintain this package and that I'm currently just an hour late, as linux-lts entered [core] not too long ago:

commit 928808f977605efd49073bf53bc42ee17f3d8f80
Author: Andreas Radke <andyrtr@archlinux.org>
Date:   Sat Nov 9 06:51:04 2024 +0000

    move linux-lts from core-testing-x86_64 to core-x86_64

But I will try my best to keep this in sync!

McCarthee commented on 2024-11-08 22:00 (UTC)

This thing is never inline with the lts kernel and it's driving me nuts.

Shubby commented on 2024-10-23 20:18 (UTC)

@unsignedzero that's great, thank you! I have an older Xeon E3-1231 v3 but I believe that'll be fine. I don't mind waiting a few minutes, it was more about whether it takes 30+ minutes or worse.

unsignedzero commented on 2024-10-23 20:04 (UTC)

@Shubby That just depends on your CPU mainly. I have a newish 7940HS box that compiles in <1 minute. The older i7-1165G7 is a bit longer (1-2? minutes) and it goes from there. I assume most boxes within the last 10 years is fine. I never noticed nor cared that much since I can run the update, leave it and come back later to a finished update. If it's less than 5 minutes, I wouldn't notice but YMMV.

mekberg commented on 2024-10-18 11:52 (UTC)

Looking at the CI link someone posted before, everything looks green. Is there a reason nothing is being published for this package?

arichiardi commented on 2024-08-05 03:14 (UTC)

Is there anything I/we can do to help here? I'd like to cause this package is as convenient as it gets 😅

Shubby commented on 2024-08-01 16:49 (UTC)

@unsignedzero I've been putting off moving away from this package and thinking about moving to dkms so I might as well ask you :) As I understand, dkms means compiling from source. Does that take a long time with zfs-dkms on your systems? Just wondering :)

unsignedzero commented on 2024-08-01 00:36 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-01 00:37 (UTC) by unsignedzero)

@LazyGamble Thanks for the update. I switched over to zfs-dkms with linux-lts and have no issues on my laptop (Intel iGPU) or NUC (AMD iGPU) and it works fine. vmware-workstation also works on both boxes.

LazyGamble commented on 2024-07-29 11:42 (UTC)

@unsignedzero builds are failing since then: https://ci.archzfs.com/#/builders

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 10 Next › Last »