Running ATLAS' performance check with make time I seem to get a rather bad performance compared to the reference performance obtained by the ATLAS authors.
http://pastebin.com/7DwbtJwX
Is there any explanation for that? Does anyone get better results?
Search Criteria
Package Details: atlas-lapack 1:3.10.3-9
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/atlas-lapack.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | atlas-lapack |
Description: | Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra Software |
Upstream URL: | http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net |
Licenses: | BSD, custom:lapack |
Provides: | atlas-lapack-base, blas, cblas, lapack |
Submitter: | ilpianista |
Maintainer: | henkm |
Last Packager: | henkm |
Votes: | 93 |
Popularity: | 0.000005 |
First Submitted: | 2008-04-24 01:36 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-02-01 12:28 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- gcc-fortran (gcc-fortran-gitAUR, gcc11-fortranAUR, gcc-fortran-snapshotAUR) (make)
Required by (548)
- abinit (requires blas)
- abinit (requires lapack)
- algodoo (requires lapack)
- ambertools (requires blas)
- ambertools (requires lapack)
- amino-git (requires cblas)
- amino-git (requires lapack)
- apbs (requires blas)
- apbs (requires lapack)
- armadillo (requires blas)
- armadillo (requires lapack)
- arpack-git (requires lapack)
- arrayfire-git (requires cblas)
- atompaw (requires lapack)
- atomsk-git (requires blas)
- atomsk-git (requires lapack)
- avs-device-sdk (requires cblas)
- basix (requires lapack)
- basix-git (requires blas)
- basix-git (requires lapack)
- Show 528 more...
Sources (4)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 18 Next › Last »
PedsXing commented on 2013-01-27 09:53 (UTC)
giniu commented on 2012-11-29 21:21 (UTC)
Are you sure you don't want to bump it? The package without this space is somewhat 11mb smaller if I remember correctly results I got.
gborzi commented on 2012-11-29 21:04 (UTC)
@giniu
thanks, I've fixed the PKGBUILD, but without changing the release number.
giniu commented on 2012-11-29 18:07 (UTC)
I believe there is a mistake in PKGBUILD, i.e. missing space before ] in line 79.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-08-29 12:57 (UTC)
Is it possible to add a link liblapack.so -> libclapack.so ?
Unfortunately this is done by Debian, so some packages look for it
in order to find ATLAS.
gborzi commented on 2012-08-04 23:02 (UTC)
Hi giniu,
I can't do it right now, I hope I'll upload a new version on monday. Thanks for reporting the problem and the fix.
giniu commented on 2012-08-04 21:34 (UTC)
Hi, there is serious regression for machines without SSE2, like Pentium III. I reported it upstream ( see https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3554109&group_id=23725&atid=379482 ) and solution was found: http://pastebin.com/nik4sChR - would be great to include that patch before new release, because it makes ATLAS badly fail on SSE1-only hardware during build, rendering it unusable.
gborzi commented on 2012-07-13 16:12 (UTC)
Updated to 3.10.0. Please let me know of any problem with this package. Now I use it only on one of the computers I manage, so I'm not able to extensively test it.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-07-12 20:30 (UTC)
New stable ATLAS 3.10.0 has been released
Pinned Comments
phcerdan commented on 2017-06-08 06:48 (UTC) (edited on 2017-06-08 06:49 (UTC) by phcerdan)