Search Criteria
Package Details: bertini-parallel 1.6-4
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/bertini.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | bertini |
Description: | Homotopy continuation solver for systems of polynomial equations - OpenMPI parallelism |
Upstream URL: | https://bertini.nd.edu |
Keywords: | bertini equations homotopy polynonials solver |
Licenses: | custom:Bertini license |
Conflicts: | bertini |
Provides: | bertini, bertini-parallel, bertini-serial, libbertini-parallel.so, libbertini-serial.so |
Submitter: | akobel |
Maintainer: | vitaliikuzhdin |
Last Packager: | vitaliikuzhdin |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2016-02-12 07:55 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-08-09 21:55 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- gmp (gmp-hgAUR)
- mpfr (mpfr-gitAUR)
- openmpi (openmpi-gitAUR)
- openmpi (openmpi-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (4)
- bertini_real
- bertini_real-git
- paramotopy (requires bertini)
- paramotopy-git (requires bertini)
Latest Comments
BachoSeven commented on 2022-08-03 08:48 (UTC)
@akobel I think I must have had those installed, however I now cannot test on the same computer anymore, and it builds fine on another one I have, so I will lyk if there is an issue when I can test it again, but at this point I suspect it was nothing.
akobel commented on 2022-08-02 22:01 (UTC)
@BackoSeven Hm, I don't have
byacc
installed, yet the build works for me.What is the message you get that makes you think
byacc
is missing? Could you double-check whether you haveyacc
(in thebison
package) andflex
installed? The are not listed as dependencies because AUR packages always assume thebase-devel
group to be installed, according to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#makedepends; can you confirm?BachoSeven commented on 2022-07-21 10:10 (UTC)
@akobel Hi again, I think this is missing
byacc
as a make dependency, and even after installing that it seems it's failing to build:BachoSeven commented on 2022-04-14 18:11 (UTC)
@akobel Hi, the sha256sums for this package seem to have changed, here is a diff for the current sums: