Package Details: compiz 0.9.14.2-10

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/compiz.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: compiz
Description: Composite manager for Aiglx and Xgl, with plugins and CCSM
Upstream URL: https://launchpad.net/compiz
Licenses: MIT, GPL-2.0-or-later, LGPL-2.1-or-later
Conflicts: ccsm, compiz-bcop, compiz-core, compiz-fusion-plugins-experimental, compiz-fusion-plugins-extra, compiz-fusion-plugins-main, compiz-gtk, compizconfig-python, libcompizconfig, simple-ccsm
Provides: ccsm, compiz-bcop, compiz-core, compiz-plugins-extra, compiz-plugins-main, compizconfig-python, libcompizconfig
Submitter: None
Maintainer: xiota
Last Packager: xiota
Votes: 168
Popularity: 0.78
First Submitted: 2014-08-04 13:22 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-03-31 09:11 (UTC)

Required by (27)

Sources (10)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 .. 56 Next › Last »

Samsagax commented on 2014-06-17 17:13 (UTC)

Would it be much of a hazzle to add MATE compatibility like this post suggests? http://forums.mate-desktop.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=42 I'm using MATE with compiz 0.9.x and it works better than compiz-core-mate package right now.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-06-11 13:33 (UTC)

Ok these are the last three changes I'm making - sorry to keep bugging you btw ;) 1) I've disabled compiling of the gconf backend and it is broken and it is no longer required for building the gtk-window-decorator. If you want to see what I've done for that, check out this diff: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=AehCZu1Y 2) I've removed the dependency on gmock. It isn't necessary as build_testing is disabled in the pkgbuild. 3) moved dconf from optdeps to deps because dconf is required for the gsettings backend which is itself required by the gtk-window-decorator

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-06-11 13:05 (UTC)

Ok these are the last two changes I'm making - sorry to keep bugging you btw ;) 1) I've disabled compiling of the gconf backend and it is broken and it is no longer required for building the gtk-window-decorator. If you want to see what I've done for that, check out this diff: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=AehCZu1Y 2) I've removed the dependency on gmock. It isn't necessary as build_testing is disabled in the pkgbuild.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-06-11 09:22 (UTC)

Added one more patch, this time to disable focus prevention.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-06-10 23:34 (UTC)

I've added another patch which will set gtk-window-decorator as the default decorator in the Window Decoration plugin.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-06-10 21:39 (UTC)

@dev_rs0 Hiya. Just letting you know that I've applied a patch to compiz-core-bzr which should fix the broken placement mode menu in the place plugin. I won't post the whole thing here but you can find the patch in the compiz-core-bzr tarball.

korrode commented on 2014-04-06 06:32 (UTC)

I agree the "core" part should be dropped from the package name.

beardedlinuxgeek commented on 2014-04-02 09:25 (UTC)

Our 0.8.x series package compiz-core doesn't come with ccsm and a lot of other features. I'm concerned that calling this compiz-core-devel will confuse the heck out of everyone because they'll assume it only includes compiz-core; the 0.9.x series used to be broken up into separate packages as well. What about merging all the official 0.8.x packages into compiz or compiz-total? Compiz is unusable as a window manager without things like the "move window" plugin installed. And Compiz 0.9.x is abandoned and that happened years after 0.8.x was abandoned. Also 0.9.7 is the current stable release of compiz-core (https://launchpad.net/compiz-core/0.9.7) but I see your point.

alucryd commented on 2014-04-02 07:25 (UTC)

devrs0: Thx, packages merged. beardedlinuxgeek: Wrong, the latest stable branch is 0.8.x, the 0.9.x branch is unstable. Now you may want to have a look at our official repositories and see that unstable releases have a -devel suffix. Now, I realize compiz-devel would be a better name since all its parts have been merged, but I think it's nice to have all main compiz packages share the same name with different suffixes (compiz-core, compiz-core-devel, compiz-core-bzr).

beardedlinuxgeek commented on 2014-04-02 06:55 (UTC)

If you want to rename the package, it should just be compiz. The latest release is 9.10; this package is for the latest release. Unfortunately because of all the dead compiz-* packages from when they were split up, naming this "compiz" would be confusing. So... compiz-dev is perfect.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 .. 56 Next › Last »