AUR (en) - efl-git

Search Criteria

Package Details: efl-git 1.27.99.67082.g6860883e18-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/efl-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	efl-git
Description:	Enlightenment Foundation Libraries - Development version
Upstream URL:	http://www.enlightenment.org
Licenses:	GPL2, custom, BSD, MIT, LGPL2.1
Conflicts:	efl, elementary, elementary-git, elementary_test, elementary_test-git, evas_generic_loaders, evas_generic_loaders-git
Provides:	efl, elementary, elementary-git, evas_generic_loaders
Submitter:	Scimmia
Maintainer:	raster
Last Packager:	raster
Votes:	87
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2013-02-15 10:00 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-08-07 08:07 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/efl-git.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

efl-git

Description:

Enlightenment Foundation Libraries - Development version

Upstream URL:

http://www.enlightenment.org

Licenses:

GPL2, custom, BSD, MIT, LGPL2.1

Conflicts:

efl, elementary, elementary-git, elementary_test, elementary_test-git, evas_generic_loaders, evas_generic_loaders-git

Provides:

efl, elementary, elementary-git, evas_generic_loaders

Submitter:

Scimmia

Maintainer:

raster

Last Packager:

raster

Votes:

Popularity:

0.000000

First Submitted:

2013-02-15 10:00 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2024-08-07 08:07 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 37 Next › Last »

raster commented on 2022-01-03 18:08 (UTC)

Yes - ccache is already listed as a dependency. I'm not sure what I can do for you to fix that - I suspect your problem is somewhere else...

isarl commented on 2022-01-03 14:05 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for maintaining this package. I apologize in advance if this report is in the wrong place. I encountered problems running makepkg -s:

$ makepkg -s
==> ERROR: Cannot find the ccache binary required for compiler cache usage.

Installing ccache separately allows makepkg to succeed. However, I checked and ccache is already listed in this package's makedepends, which is why I suspect I may be reporting this problem in the wrong place. Again, apologies if that is the case.

Scimmia commented on 2021-05-19 12:44 (UTC)

Please stop with all of the useless bumping. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Flagging_packages_out-of-date

raster commented on 2020-10-21 19:01 (UTC)

why add physics? it has essentially gone unused by anything. no one ever used the physics stuff in edje. the only example use (efbb - a game) was a demo and otherwise it hasn't gotten used. it isn't used in enlightenment either, terminology, rage etc. or anything i know of worth talking about other than demos of "oh look- it works". that's why i was disabled by default upstream. including it when its not used costs a few hundred kb of real dirty ram (dirty pages linked in from bullet - this was discussed at enlightenment developer day) so... it went off for many good reasons. so give a reason to reverse this direction. a very very very good one... :)

EndlessEden commented on 2020-10-21 11:14 (UTC)

please add ephysics and include it in list of provides (-dphysics=true)

Also, ive made a complementary efl-full-git package (incomplete, as i need to fix depends, etc) to include both deprecated and uncommon features. - If this stands as a issue, please just reply to this comment and let me know.

raster commented on 2020-04-08 22:41 (UTC)

well, no point worrying about it then. it builds and works.

maderios commented on 2020-04-08 19:05 (UTC)

I tried again. I could compile successfully efl, enlightenment, rage and terminology. I did not change any package version...

raster commented on 2020-04-08 16:54 (UTC)

oh wait... i see what you mean... those errors appear before the build completes... they scrolled off my screen, but package build finished. so i do see this.. but it's not a fatal error. again - something in binutils i guess.

raster commented on 2020-04-08 16:02 (UTC)

well i can't go fix binutils/compiler problems... the same source builds fine with slightly older stuff... this is a problem that should be reported probably to the maintainers of those packages... ?