Package Details: firefox-kde-opensuse 134.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-kde-opensuse.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-kde-opensuse
Description: Standalone web browser from mozilla.org with OpenSUSE patch, integrate better with KDE
Upstream URL: https://github.com/openSUSE/firefox-maintenance
Keywords: browser gecko web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: firefox
Provides: firefox
Submitter: csslayer
Maintainer: Thaodan
Last Packager: Thaodan
Votes: 336
Popularity: 0.018514
First Submitted: 2009-12-11 09:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-03 15:56 (UTC)

Required by (172)

Sources (35)

Pinned Comments

Thaodan commented on 2021-04-20 17:40 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-21 22:45 (UTC) by Thaodan)

If you have issues with this package visit gitlab and read the readme first.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 .. 139 Next › Last »

matteo81 commented on 2011-03-23 10:24 (UTC)

@quantumphaze: same here (process:32383): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed kmozillahelper(32391)/kdecore (KSycoca) KSycocaPrivate::openDatabase: Trying to open ksycoca from "/var/tmp/kdecache-agostine/ksycoca4" [1] 32383 segmentation fault firefox

quantumphaze commented on 2011-03-23 07:15 (UTC)

It dies for me with this output: $ firefox (process:19336): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed This did not happen with the firefox-beta-kde-opensuse packages.

csslayer commented on 2011-03-23 03:40 (UTC)

@hermes14, fixed in -2. sorry for that.

hermes14 commented on 2011-03-22 21:01 (UTC)

Confirm what raku says: why is it installed in /usr/lib/firefox-4.0b instead of /usr/lib/firefox-4.0? firefox-i18n and arch-firefox-search don't work properly.

raku commented on 2011-03-22 20:09 (UTC)

Isn't firefox-kde-opensuse supposed to install in /usr/lib/firefox-4.0 instead of /usr/lib/firefox-4.0b? Because of this issue I can't get firefox-i18n working properly.

csslayer commented on 2011-03-22 12:46 (UTC)

Yes, the difference is in mozconfig. I enabled libproxy right now. From previous comment (long long ago..), seems there is someone want it.

birdflesh commented on 2011-03-22 12:40 (UTC)

The original pkgbuild for xulrunner 2.0 does not depend on libproxy at all. http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/xulrunner/trunk/PKGBUILD You might want to check this out.

csslayer commented on 2011-03-22 07:25 (UTC)

4.0 - i686 is up, and attention, cairo-1.10.2-2 in testing is required. Otherwise you need to change mozconfig to build without system-cairo, or install cairo-tee from AUR. Another problem is libproxy 0.4.6-3 has dependency error, https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23377, so if xulrunner fails to compile or firefox cannot start, ldd /usr/lib/libproxy.so check you do not miss any lib.

csslayer commented on 2011-03-21 14:44 (UTC)

Yes, the source is out, but I'd wait for offical announcement. ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/4.0/source/