Package Details: firefox-kde-opensuse 127.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-kde-opensuse.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-kde-opensuse
Description: Standalone web browser from mozilla.org with OpenSUSE patch, integrate better with KDE
Upstream URL: https://github.com/openSUSE/firefox-maintenance
Keywords: browser gecko web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: firefox
Provides: firefox
Submitter: csslayer
Maintainer: Thaodan
Last Packager: Thaodan
Votes: 336
Popularity: 0.33
First Submitted: 2009-12-11 09:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-21 20:54 (UTC)

Required by (167)

Sources (37)

Pinned Comments

Thaodan commented on 2021-04-20 17:40 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-21 22:45 (UTC) by Thaodan)

If you have issues with this package visit gitlab and read the readme first.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 .. 139 Next › Last »

Stas_pythonist commented on 2014-02-12 15:52 (UTC)

Works great! Thanks. Is there a chance to make package like this but for Firefox 29 Australis? Or Suse patches is incompatible with other versions?

pitt commented on 2014-02-10 20:00 (UTC)

my ff is running - thank you.

xbond commented on 2014-02-10 10:31 (UTC)

@helq, you are awesome! Thank you.

helq commented on 2014-02-09 16:13 (UTC)

@xbond, well the revision numbers are the numbers of the commits (I think), if you are familiar with the commits. Well, I found the revision numbers with a procedure like this: first I see the revisions in the opensuse project (https://build.opensuse.org/package/revisions/mozilla:Factory/MozillaFirefox) and find what revision is the correct (I found the correct version only reading what version said 27.0). Than I search the corresponding number revision (here: http://www.rosenauer.org/hg/mozilla/shortlog). The differences between the post and the PKGBUILD are due to I realized to late in the compilation that i'm using the wrong revision number, and I'm too lazy to recompile with the "correct" revision. But, the differences between the two revisions are minimal (see http://www.rosenauer.org/hg/mozilla/rev/52284fd63667). The only real difference is that 52284fd63667 add a list of the bugs corrected in the version 27.0 (I think. If someone understand well what that list mean, please explain us, thank you), it's not really an important change, it's not alter the operation of firefox at all, but is the "correct" revision number to use in the compilation. PS: sorry for my bad English, and sorry for the looong post. PS2: I hope I have explained well (^^). if not, please reply.

xbond commented on 2014-02-09 12:13 (UTC)

helq, great, that worked for me, thank you! BTW, why in the post you tell patchrev should be 52284fd63667, though in the PKGBUILD you provided it's f810fbe5fece... How to get this revision numbers at all? =)

helq commented on 2014-02-07 13:56 (UTC)

Change in the PKGBUILD: - pkgver=26.0 to pkgver=27.0 - _patchrev=afcaf2131b0e to _patchrev=52284fd63667 A compiled package: http://www.mediafire.com/download/ufwmhcpya2b1d9c/firefox-kde-opensuse-27.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz using: http://www.mediafire.com/view/vb1ez3o2xjc44nj/PKGBUILD

pitt commented on 2014-02-07 09:27 (UTC)

Just trying the PKGBUILD on Firefox to change 27.0. Sorry, an error comes without further information. patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input. ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare (). Aborting ... Greeting

Buddlespit commented on 2014-02-06 22:53 (UTC)

rezad, I don't have a problem with firefox or flash showing flash content, including the site you listed.

rezad commented on 2014-02-02 07:08 (UTC)

this version of firefox has some problem with flash playing on certain sites, which is because of the config and maybe css and stuff (i am not a web developer) cause i can see the ifarme separately but not on the site. for example this site will show blinking iframe and no video(maybe because it has a age verification flash (with a empty profile) "http://www.redbandclips.com/red-band/77e4/bad_words_red_band_trailer/"