Oops sorry for the inconvenience. This should be fixed in 11.2.202.236-3.
Search Criteria
Package Details: flashplayer-standalone 32.0.0.465-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/flashplayer-standalone.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | flashplayer-standalone |
Description: | Adobe Flash Player Standalone (A.K.A. Adobe Flash Player Projector) |
Upstream URL: | http://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html |
Licenses: | LGPL, custom:Adobe |
Submitter: | ly50247 |
Maintainer: | frealgagu |
Last Packager: | frealgagu |
Votes: | 191 |
Popularity: | 1.07 |
First Submitted: | 2010-06-21 06:25 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2020-12-09 05:09 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- libgl (nvidia-340xx-utilsAUR, libglvnd-gitAUR, amdgpu-pro-oglpAUR, amdgpu-pro-oglp-legacyAUR, libglvnd)
- nss (nss-hgAUR)
- gendesk (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for sound through alsa
Required by (15)
Sources (1)
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-07-14 07:10 (UTC)
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-07-03 23:59 (UTC)
@jose1711 edit pkgbuild and change pkgbase by pkgname
CC: @ly50247 @fleger
jose1711 commented on 2012-07-01 13:52 (UTC)
pkgbase is undefined hence this error cp: cannot stat '/home/jose/tarballs/flashplayer-standalone/.install': No such file or directory
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-07-01 07:44 (UTC)
OK guys I made a separate package for x86_64 available at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60448
wuffleton commented on 2012-06-30 01:28 (UTC)
Just wondering, does anyone know where I can find a copy of the final x86_64 archive? I'd prefer to keep running my outdated native x64 version if possible, since a 41 package dependency chain to run one program is pretty ridiculous. Thanks!
beej commented on 2012-06-25 16:03 (UTC)
I have to agree with josephgbr. It's strange that I have a package on my system, bin32-flashplayer-standalone, that does not exist in the official repo or in AUR.
rafaelff commented on 2012-06-20 06:02 (UTC)
IMO the pkgname should simple be flashplayer-standalone, not bin32 in front of it for 64bit systems.
beej commented on 2012-06-15 20:40 (UTC)
Installing bin32-flashplayer-standalone when the AUR package is called flashplayer-standalone is harshing my build scripts, and my out-of-date-check scripts. I'll code around it, but I don't know if putting regular and bin32 in the same AUR script is the best thing.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-06-09 04:55 (UTC)
@nikolardo: on x86_64, enable the multilib repository
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-06-08 17:51 (UTC)
Flagged out of date b.c. checksum of flashplayer_11_sa.i386.tar.gz fails.
Pinned Comments
Omar007 commented on 2021-01-04 23:16 (UTC) (edited on 2021-01-04 23:33 (UTC) by Omar007)
As far as I'm aware that is only applicable to the web-browser plugin version. Standalone/Projector should still work fine. At the very least 32.0.0.453 which is the last update I pushed is still working perfectly fine here. (haven't build/updated to 465 yet so I can't say anything about that)
Since 371 is also one I pushed I can try and see if it's still in a build cache of mine but don't keep your hopes up (and regardless; it really shouldn't matter for the standalone/projector version)
EDIT: Last build cache for that version was removed 6 months ago so I no longer have it and my backups for those only go back 1 month.
EDIT2: I just see that the date for the time bomb wasn't 01-01-2021 but a tad later this month so the projector might start failing later.
EDIT3: If the standalone/projector does indeed also end up containing said time-bomb, the next best solution I can think of is to use Ruffle browser addon/extension to play your flash content using your browser.
frealgagu commented on 2020-12-05 22:36 (UTC)
I maintain the latest built package at:
https://github.com/frealgagu/archlinux.flashplayer-standalone/releases/