Package Details: freshplayerplugin-git 0.3.11.r4.g0f46d4a-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freshplayerplugin-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: freshplayerplugin-git
Description: PPAPI-host NPAPI-plugin adapter.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: freshplayerplugin
Submitter: Behem0th
Maintainer: WorMzy
Last Packager: WorMzy
Votes: 147
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2014-03-31 20:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-12-29 21:38 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »

intelfx commented on 2014-05-27 19:48 (UTC)

@Behem0th OK. Since conditional/complex dependencies are not supported by makepkg/pacman (so we cannot write "depends on chromium-pepper-flash || google-chrome"), I then propose to evaluate which use-case is more common from these two: - one uses firefox and chrome simultaneously - one uses just firefox OR firefox and chromium simultaneously Then the more common use-case can be honored in PKGBUILD, while the less common one can be e. g. commented out.

Behem0th commented on 2014-05-27 14:04 (UTC)

@intelfx I'm not sure about the validity of your proposal. Why this package mast supportchromium-pepper-flash instead google-chrome? It's easier for users chromium, but users google-chrome must install extra package.

intelfx commented on 2014-05-27 07:35 (UTC)

You seem to be misusing the `install -D` command in your package() function. Also, as there is now a configuration file and a possibility to override libpepflashplayer.so's location, the package can be made compatible with chromium-pepper-flash. I propose the following patch to PKGBUILD (both issues addressed): http://ix.io/cFc

orschiro commented on 2014-05-26 20:23 (UTC)

@Behem0th Thanks for your response. For chromium there exists the AUR package `chromium-pepper-flash` Thus I am wondering how this package can be made compatible with both, Chrome and Chromium without having to have installed both of them.

Behem0th commented on 2014-05-26 15:39 (UTC)

>Does google-chrome need to be a dependency Yes. google-chrome contain flashplugin needed for this package. >What if I run Chromium AFAIK Chromium don,t contain flashplugin. You mast install google-chrome, or manually copy libpepflashplayer.so in /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/ from google-chrome package.

orschiro commented on 2014-05-26 06:58 (UTC)

Does google-chrome need to be a dependency? What if I run Chromium?

12eason commented on 2014-05-22 21:15 (UTC)

Also, it needs the dep libconfig

12eason commented on 2014-05-22 21:11 (UTC)

This might be an upstream bug, but there's a conflict with rednotebook for some reason. Can anyone else confirm? ~ % rednotebook 2014-05-22 22:04:37,207 DEBUG Debug message 2014-05-22 22:04:37,207 INFO Writing log to file "/home/user/.rednotebook/rednotebook.log" 2014-05-22 22:04:37,207 INFO System encoding: UTF-8 2014-05-22 22:04:37,207 INFO Language code: en_GB NOT SANDBOXED [ERROR:flash/platform/pepper/common/pep_process.cpp(19)] CHECK(g_process_type == PROCESS_TYPE_UNKNOWN) failed java version "1.7.0_55" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.4.7) (ArchLinux build 7.u55_2.4.7-1-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.51-b03, mixed mode) [1] 10868 abort (core dumped) rednotebook

Behem0th commented on 2014-05-20 18:05 (UTC)

@meowcats I don't understand. this package don't contain google-chrome. package contain only one md5sum 'SKIP', for source git tree.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »