Package Details: freshplayerplugin-git 0.3.11.r4.g0f46d4a-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freshplayerplugin-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: freshplayerplugin-git
Description: PPAPI-host NPAPI-plugin adapter.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: freshplayerplugin
Submitter: Behem0th
Maintainer: WorMzy
Last Packager: WorMzy
Votes: 147
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2014-03-31 20:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-12-29 21:38 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »

marcelhuber commented on 2014-07-01 11:54 (UTC)

There is another patch here with takes care of correct execute permissions: http://paste.mate-desktop.org/view/358dab41

intelfx commented on 2014-06-29 11:03 (UTC)

The upstream now provides several libraries; PKGBUILD needs to be updated to install those. ix.io tells me HTTP 500, so: ftp://intelfx.homenet.org/freshplayer-pkgbuild.patch

orschiro commented on 2014-06-18 13:52 (UTC)

@SanskritFritz Thanks! I will mention it on the chromium-pepper-flash-dev AUR page.

SanskritFritz commented on 2014-06-18 11:41 (UTC)

@orschiro yes, exactly. This is the way to handle these kind of conflicts. All -dev, -beta -git, -svn etc packages should provide the base package, this way one can choose to use a dev package as dependency.

orschiro commented on 2014-06-18 11:38 (UTC)

@SanskritFritz Thanks! So, the PKGBUILD [1] should contain a provide='chromium-pepper-flash' line? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ch/chromium-pepper-flash-dev/PKGBUILD

SanskritFritz commented on 2014-06-17 08:56 (UTC)

chromium-pepper-flash-dev should provide chromium-pepper-flash

orschiro commented on 2014-06-17 08:54 (UTC)

Is it possible to make the dependence on either chromium-pepper-flash or chromium-pepper-flash-dev? I use chromium-pepper-flash-dev and don't want to remove it in favour of chromium-pepper-flash.

Behem0th commented on 2014-06-16 14:38 (UTC)

@WorMzy >do you mean that I could edit the dependencies to suit my own needs? Yes. >make them available for everyone. For this reason i include gtk2 in dependencies. >I'm not sure what you mean by the last part of your message Sorry for that. English not my lang and i use google translate. ;-(