Package Details: google-chrome-beta 132.0.6834.15-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome-beta.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome-beta
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Beta Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Provides: google-chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 357
Popularity: 1.08
First Submitted: 2009-12-08 19:09 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-20 23:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Required by (41)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-11-30 17:09 (UTC)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Beta updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome beta version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-beta" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 27 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-10-09 18:31 (UTC)

@af9210 Only for Windows and Mac: https://omahaproxy.appspot.com/ http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com.br/2014/10/beta-channel-update_9.html

af9210 commented on 2014-10-09 18:18 (UTC)

v39.0.2171.13 is out

Det commented on 2014-09-18 18:38 (UTC)

Oh yeah :D?

Brottweiler commented on 2014-09-18 17:27 (UTC)

Uhm, validity check failed again...

Det commented on 2014-08-14 12:41 (UTC)

I get notified on that already.

SymLynx commented on 2014-07-24 22:47 (UTC)

validy check failed for beta37 DEB.

Det commented on 2014-07-02 21:01 (UTC)

I get notified on that already.

rabcor commented on 2014-07-01 16:39 (UTC)

Flagged out of date; validity check of google-chrome-beta_36.0.1985.97_amd64.deb Failed.

Det commented on 2014-06-04 00:30 (UTC)

No it isn't.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 27 Next › Last »