Package Details: joplin-desktop 3.0.14-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/joplin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: joplin
Description: A note taking and to-do application with synchronization capabilities - Desktop
Upstream URL: https://joplinapp.org/
Keywords: markdown note notetaking productivity
Licenses: MIT
Groups: joplin
Conflicts: joplin-desktop-electron
Submitter: masterkorp
Maintainer: masterkorp
Last Packager: masterkorp
Votes: 262
Popularity: 1.54
First Submitted: 2018-04-18 16:33 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-29 19:54 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

masterkorp commented on 2021-12-27 11:30 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-27 11:32 (UTC) by masterkorp)

Hello everyone,

There was been several difficulties upgrading the Joplin due to major changes in the build system upstream.

I have finnally got version 2.6.10 working with pacthes, but remenber:

  • You may need to remove your src/ folder before using this version

  • The patches are still not perfect, you must say yes to a prompt

I will continue working on this later today, but its usable and stable, please remenber you can always report issues on the github repository.

Regards, Alfredo Palhares

masterkorp commented on 2020-12-24 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-24 20:00 (UTC) by masterkorp)

Hello everyone,

I will be renaming the packages to its final form.

  • joplin will contain the CLI application
  • joplin-desktop will contain the Desktop version

Also, please for problems with the package, please open an issue on the Github repo, its really hard to provide support on the comments section, you can also email me.

If you have problems with the check() function, just run makepkg with the --nocheck flag.

Thank you for your patience. Regards, Alfredo Palhares

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2019-04-12 08:43 (UTC)

I think the PKGBUILD needs a runtime dependency on libxss; electron seems to link this library, and the desktop app won't start if it's missing.

silicht commented on 2019-04-04 06:27 (UTC)

changing pkgver to 1.0.142 and last sha256sums to 11f22415dc49793c7f024f48c0b20ee04aa32254ee0d0a87f843d5f12c7527a3 seems to be enough for updating to 1.0.142.

jeagoss commented on 2019-03-31 01:15 (UTC)

The following patch was used to build in a clean chroot per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot

https://pastebin.com/kLds16vg

CodeFox commented on 2019-03-06 14:21 (UTC)

@masterkorp is it possible to get this package updated to the right hash? the 135 version also has a bad hash sum check.

gonesimera commented on 2019-03-04 09:05 (UTC)

@sseneca Thank you, it is updating now.

sseneca commented on 2019-03-02 13:24 (UTC)

@nunoun and @gonesimera

You have to replace the sha256sum that @petsam posted with the first sha256sum found in the array "sha256sums".

So it should look like this:

sha256sums=('01bf4f7e311d79b7e309e158c46b6dd321194eb17e90f09db3ff41b75f35fffa'
            ...)

gonesimera commented on 2019-03-02 07:43 (UTC)

I have exactly the same problem as @nunoun

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... joplin.desktop ... FAILED joplin-desktop.sh ... Passed joplin.sh ... Passed v1.0.135.zip ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

If I use the sha256sum suggested by @petsam I get the following error: ==> ERROR: Integrity checks (sha256) differ in size from the source array.

Kunda commented on 2019-03-01 21:45 (UTC)

@petsam thank you that worked.

nunonun commented on 2019-03-01 09:24 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-01 09:30 (UTC) by nunonun)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... joplin.desktop ... FAILED joplin-desktop.sh ... Passed joplin.sh ... Passed v1.0.135.zip ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

If I use the sha256sum suggested by @petsam I get the following error: ==> ERROR: Integrity checks (sha256) differ in size from the source array.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Next › Last »