Search Criteria
Package Details: libdrm-git 2.4.114.r2.ge699b28b-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/libdrm-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | libdrm-git |
Description: | Userspace interface to kernel DRM services, master git version |
Upstream URL: | http://dri.freedesktop.org/ |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | libdrm |
Provides: | libdrm |
Submitter: | Lone_Wolf |
Maintainer: | Lone_Wolf |
Last Packager: | Lone_Wolf |
Votes: | 9 |
Popularity: | 0.142113 |
First Submitted: | 2015-12-23 15:03 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-11-15 21:27 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- libpciaccess (libpciaccess-gitAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- meson (meson-gitAUR) (make)
- ninja (ninja-kitwareAUR, ninja-memAUR, ninja-fuchsia-gitAUR, ninja-gitAUR, ninja-jobserverAUR) (make)
- python-docutils (make)
- cairo (cairo-gitAUR) (check)
- cunit (bcunit-cunit-compatAUR, cunit-svnAUR) (check)
Required by (448)
- aio-remote-neo (requires libdrm)
- alephium-desktop-wallet-bin (requires libdrm)
- alvr (requires libdrm)
- alvr-git (requires libdrm)
- alvr-nvidia (requires libdrm)
- amdgpu-pro-oglp-legacy (requires libdrm)
- amdgpu_top (requires libdrm)
- amdgpu_top-bin (requires libdrm)
- amdgpu_top-git (requires libdrm)
- amdonly-gaming-libva-mesa-driver-git (requires libdrm)
- amdonly-gaming-libva-mesa-driver-git (requires libdrm) (make)
- amdonly-gaming-mesa-git (requires libdrm)
- amdonly-gaming-mesa-git (requires libdrm) (make)
- amdonly-gaming-mesa-vdpau-git (requires libdrm)
- amdonly-gaming-mesa-vdpau-git (requires libdrm) (make)
- amdonly-gaming-opencl-clover-mesa-git (requires libdrm)
- amdonly-gaming-opencl-clover-mesa-git (requires libdrm) (make)
- amdonly-gaming-opencl-rusticl-mesa-git (requires libdrm)
- amdonly-gaming-opencl-rusticl-mesa-git (requires libdrm) (make)
- amdonly-gaming-vulkan-mesa-layers-git (requires libdrm)
- Show 428 more...
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »
waschtl commented on 2019-12-18 21:58 (UTC)
On my system one of the checks (
threaded
) took longer than meson's default of 30s. This is a problem that was also noticed by the LFS guys [1].On my system, the test completed successfully after 68.48s. It is a fairly old system (Intel Core i3-380M from 2010), but probably not the oldest to be used when compiling this package.
The simple fix would be to add a timeout multiplier to the
meson test
command. A multiplier of 10 will increase the timeout to 300s, which should be enough for far older systems, as well.The more complex fix would be to patch libdrm's
threaded
test so that it has its own timeout value, like therandom
test probably does (as it runs longer with no issues).[1] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/libdrm.html
Lone_Wolf commented on 2019-05-23 10:23 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-23 10:24 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)
When I started this package I used the licensing stuff from extra/libdrm.
I've looked at the libdrm source tree and there's no general licensing statement. Almost every invidual file has it's own copyright section in them.
Even if all files fall under the MIT license now, we'd have to extract the copyright notices with the names of the copyright holders and put that in one or more files in the /usr/share/licenses/$pkgname .
We know now that atleast libdrm, lib32-libdrm , libdrm-git , lib32-libdrm-git and amdgpu-pro have to deal with this, there may be others.
I think this should be discussed on the arch-general mailing list. Please start a topic there about this, Ashark.
Ashark commented on 2019-05-22 17:37 (UTC)
Hi. Shouldn't this package's license be changed to MIT? And also for libdrm that's in Extra. I am asking because I am repacking amdgpu-pro and there is also such situation (several MIT texts).
Lone_Wolf commented on 2018-09-02 11:51 (UTC)
Upstream solved the test failure they introduced, no need to use makepkg --nocheck anymore.
SR_team commented on 2018-08-12 14:38 (UTC)
11/16 amdgpu-symbol-check FAIL 0.42 s (exit status 1)
Lone_Wolf commented on 2017-08-14 11:36 (UTC)
pschichtel commented on 2017-08-13 18:02 (UTC)
Lone_Wolf commented on 2017-04-05 22:02 (UTC) (edited on 2017-04-05 22:02 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)
damien commented on 2017-04-05 11:22 (UTC)
Lone_Wolf commented on 2016-11-13 16:50 (UTC)
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »