Package Details: librewolf-bin 134.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/librewolf-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: librewolf-bin
Description: Community-maintained fork of Firefox, focused on privacy, security and freedom.
Upstream URL: https://librewolf-community.gitlab.io/
Keywords: browser web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: librewolf
Provides: librewolf
Submitter: lsf
Maintainer: lsf
Last Packager: lsf
Votes: 417
Popularity: 14.52
First Submitted: 2019-06-16 13:12 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-26 21:57 (UTC)

Dependencies (16)

Required by (27)

Sources (7)

Pinned Comments

lsf commented on 2021-11-10 12:14 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-17 07:18 (UTC) by lsf)

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Acquire_a_PGP_public_key_if_needed

gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys 031F7104E932F7BD7416E7F6D2845E1305D6E801

/edit: starting with 112.0-1, the binaries are signed with the maintainers shared key, so gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys 662E3CDD6FE329002D0CA5BB40339DD82B12EF16 should do the trick instead. I've also signed the key with the previously used key, so you have at least some guarantee that it's not a malicious attack :)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 19 Next › Last »

blutuna commented on 2024-08-06 11:41 (UTC)

@karoyli... I get the following on my 5950, no tweaks to the installs... FF = 21.1 LW = 15.7 Floorp = 13.6 SRWare Iron = 20.6 Mullvad = 8.64

MrClon commented on 2024-08-05 05:24 (UTC)

May be librewolf disable some runtime optimization for privacy reasons

mabod commented on 2024-08-04 18:48 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-04 20:08 (UTC) by mabod)

Nice joke. But still, from my point of view librewolf should at least reach the same performance ratings as firefox.

karolyi commented on 2024-08-04 17:39 (UTC)

@mabod, if that matters: I get a value of Infinity (no kidding) with a self-compiled librewolf (only my own patch is applied extra, it's why I compile manually), and 21.4 on FF 128.0 on my 5950.

I guess my librewolf surpassed lightspeed? :)

mabod commented on 2024-08-04 17:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-05 05:54 (UTC) by mabod)

Something is wrong with the performance of this binary on my Ryzen 9 5900X. When I test performance with https://browserbench.org/Speedometer3.0/ I get a score of only 11,9. Firefox with the same version 128.0.3 reaches a score of 13,7, which is 15 % better. Since both are using the same source code I would assume librewolf-bin is using different compiler options. When I compile librewolf by myself with 

CFLAGS="-march=x86-64-v3 -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -fexceptions \
    -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Werror=format-security \
    -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection"

I get a score of 15,9, which is excellent. Only exceeded by Chromium with 17,9. So something seems to be odd with the compiler options used to build librewolf-bin.

FrostyWave commented on 2024-07-28 08:01 (UTC)

there is new release 128.0.3-1

marbens commented on 2024-07-28 04:18 (UTC)

This package is NOT out-of-date. Somebody used an out-of-date flag as a "bug report."

rcfox commented on 2024-07-22 18:52 (UTC)

I'm having issues closing any pop-up menu by clicking away from them, whether it be right click menus or from an addon, etc. Is anyone else experiencing this?

impulse commented on 2024-06-23 19:32 (UTC)

Can you please add me as a co-maintainer so i can keep this package up-to-date?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 19 Next › Last »