Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-ck |
Description: | Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel |
Upstream URL: | https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only |
Submitter: | graysky |
Maintainer: | graysky |
Last Packager: | graysky |
Votes: | 459 |
Popularity: | 0.135126 |
First Submitted: | 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC) |
Dependencies (11)
- linux-ckAUR
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR)
- bc (bc-ghAUR) (make)
- cpio (cpio-gitAUR) (make)
- gettext (gettext-gitAUR) (make)
- libelf (elfutils-gitAUR) (make)
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- tar (tar-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR) (make)
- xz (xz-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (8)
- ch343-dkms (optional)
- ch343ser-dkms-git (optional)
- ch9344ser-dkms-git (optional)
- e1000e-dkms (optional)
- fl2000-dkms (optional)
- i2c-ch341-dkms (optional)
- igb-dkms (optional)
- spi-config-dkms (optional)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 .. 308 Next › Last »
Saren commented on 2019-01-01 06:13 (UTC)
Hi, since 4.20-ck NUMA is disabled regardless of
_NUMAdisable
.$ numactl -s
showsNo NUMA support available on this system.
zoopp commented on 2018-12-27 12:46 (UTC)
I usually build with native optimisations detected by GCC however there's a problem if I assign anything to the _subarch variable. Early during the build this question pops up:
Support for P6_NOPs on Intel chips (X86_P6_NOP) [N/y/?] (NEW)
.. which is answered with the value of _subarch variable (27 in my case).
Since this isn't an accepted answer, the question loops endlessly.
Not really a big issue but I thought I should mention it.
air-g4p commented on 2018-12-12 09:51 (UTC)
@graysky:
Same here: Built linux-ck 4.19.8-1 without issue yesterday, and all seems to be running well and as expected since then.
Ropid commented on 2018-12-09 03:07 (UTC) (edited on 2018-12-09 03:11 (UTC) by Ropid)
@graysky:
On first look, it seems to work fine for me. I built and booted into this 4.19.8 version a few hours ago.
I don't see anything unusual happening in the journal. Programs, games and the desktop don't seem to misbehave.
graysky commented on 2018-12-08 17:22 (UTC)
I heard from CK that it is unlikely he will be able to unfuck 4.19-ck1 before the release of 4.20. Fortunately, a user on the blog posted two patches which seem to do just that. I have adapted them to the PKGBUILD for 4.19.7 and for 4.19.8. I have been testing 4.19.7-ck1 and it has been running without issues. I am building 4.19.8-ck1 now. I pushed 4.19.8 to the AUR just now and am requesting some user feedback on stability and performance. I will build the repo set once we some confirmation that all is well. Thanks.
graysky commented on 2018-12-05 22:53 (UTC)
@lukpod - Not out of date, see pinned comment:
graysky commented on 2018-12-05 20:32 (UTC)
Even though 4.19.7 has been released, several upstream changes therein break ck1. Please do not flag out-of-date until Con releases an update.
graysky commented on 2018-12-01 12:25 (UTC)
@FarStar - False alarm... I made a mistake in my config when building. No issues with 4.19.6.
FarStar commented on 2018-12-01 12:08 (UTC)
Hello graysky,
What kind of problems? I have slowdowns at times but I don't know if it's related.
graysky commented on 2018-12-01 12:04 (UTC)
Anyone else experiencing problems relating to networking under 4.19.6?
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 .. 308 Next › Last »